Satanic Temple to offer abortion services in New Mexico

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


I am not that person however, Satanic Temple isn't in charge, they are an optional group.

Red Republican MAGA Conservative politicians daily make decisions that affect us all. Which by the way is horrific. They are literally liars, criminals, grifters and downright Traitors to the US. From child brides to open carry to women dying currently daily because of medical issues that are none of Republicans' business.

While you may find that Temple is not to your liking we sure as hell stand with the place that supports women. Which by the way your boys are coming for everything women.

PRO CHOICE< PRO TEMPLE< PRO WOMEN

Wake up.



As several pages back: show us where women are dying daily. A link from each day that shows women are dying every single day.

Child brides? What are you talking about?
Open carry? New Mexico is an Open Carry State, meaning it is legal to carry a loaded weapon as long as it is not concealed. Why is the Satanic Temple opening their “medical clinic” in a state that allows it’s citizens to openly carry loaded weapons?

The Temple (which you are defending) is not defending women. New Mexico already allows telehealth abortion. Women in New Mexico can consult a medical provider using phone or computer and have pills mailed to their home.

https://www.plancpills.org/states/new-mexico#telehealth

What the Satanic Temple (which supports white nationalism, is financially opaque, sues former members into silence) is doing is fundraising off of girls and women in distress.

If a woman lives in a state with abortion prohibition or restriction, and she uses TST to obtain abortion pills, she can be prosecuted. The Satanic Temple will not use their resources to defend her in court. (They uses Alex Jones’ attorney anyway, so idk.)

I have posted a link to 13 telehealth abortion providers operating in NM that do not require women to become Satanic or perform a ritual to access needed health care, and aren’t selling merchandise advertising their services.

You are completely off your rocker with your posted screed. You don’t care about women. You care about your goofy and evil white supremacy lying temple.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


I am not that person however, Satanic Temple isn't in charge, they are an optional group.

Red Republican MAGA Conservative politicians daily make decisions that affect us all. Which by the way is horrific. They are literally liars, criminals, grifters and downright Traitors to the US. From child brides to open carry to women dying currently daily because of medical issues that are none of Republicans' business.

While you may find that Temple is not to your liking we sure as hell stand with the place that supports women. Which by the way your boys are coming for everything women.

PRO CHOICE< PRO TEMPLE< PRO WOMEN

Wake up.


Your equation is so very, very telling, in how you put the Satanic Temple *above* being pro-choice.

So you think racism, anti-semitism and eugenics are *a step above* simply being pro choice.

Anybody who rejects white nationalism (including me, because I'm anti-MAGA and I posted the links to non-coercive pill sources) would write the equations this way:

PRO LIFE = PRO RACISM & PRO ANTI-SEMITISM = ANTI WOMEN (all are bad)

MAGA & SATANIC TEMPLE & PRO LIFE <<<<<<<<<<< PRO CHOICE < PRO NON-COERCIVE WOMENS GROUPS WHO GIVE OUT THE PILLS




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


I am not that person however, Satanic Temple isn't in charge, they are an optional group.

Red Republican MAGA Conservative politicians daily make decisions that affect us all. Which by the way is horrific. They are literally liars, criminals, grifters and downright Traitors to the US. From child brides to open carry to women dying currently daily because of medical issues that are none of Republicans' business.

While you may find that Temple is not to your liking we sure as hell stand with the place that supports women. Which by the way your boys are coming for everything women.

PRO CHOICE< PRO TEMPLE< PRO WOMEN

Wake up.


Your equation is so very, very telling, in how you put the Satanic Temple *above* being pro-choice.

So you think racism, anti-semitism and eugenics are *a step above* simply being pro choice.

Anybody who rejects white nationalism (including me, because I'm anti-MAGA and I posted the links to non-coercive pill sources) would write the equations this way:

PRO LIFE = PRO RACISM & PRO ANTI-SEMITISM = ANTI WOMEN (all are bad)

MAGA & SATANIC TEMPLE & PRO LIFE <<<<<<<<<<< PRO CHOICE < PRO NON-COERCIVE WOMENS GROUPS WHO GIVE OUT THE PILLS






pp with a correction: looks like another pp also posted links to women's groups who will provide the pill by mail to New Mexico (and other states) without requiring women in distress to give their money to a group that supports white nationalism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


I am not that person however, Satanic Temple isn't in charge, they are an optional group.

Red Republican MAGA Conservative politicians daily make decisions that affect us all. Which by the way is horrific. They are literally liars, criminals, grifters and downright Traitors to the US. From child brides to open carry to women dying currently daily because of medical issues that are none of Republicans' business.

While you may find that Temple is not to your liking we sure as hell stand with the place that supports women. Which by the way your boys are coming for everything women.

PRO CHOICE< PRO TEMPLE< PRO WOMEN

Wake up.



As several pages back: show us where women are dying daily. A link from each day that shows women are dying every single day.

Child brides? What are you talking about?
Open carry? New Mexico is an Open Carry State, meaning it is legal to carry a loaded weapon as long as it is not concealed. Why is the Satanic Temple opening their “medical clinic” in a state that allows it’s citizens to openly carry loaded weapons?

The Temple (which you are defending) is not defending women. New Mexico already allows telehealth abortion. Women in New Mexico can consult a medical provider using phone or computer and have pills mailed to their home.

https://www.plancpills.org/states/new-mexico#telehealth

What the Satanic Temple (which supports white nationalism, is financially opaque, sues former members into silence) is doing is fundraising off of girls and women in distress.

If a woman lives in a state with abortion prohibition or restriction, and she uses TST to obtain abortion pills, she can be prosecuted. The Satanic Temple will not use their resources to defend her in court. (They uses Alex Jones’ attorney anyway, so idk.)

I have posted a link to 13 telehealth abortion providers operating in NM that do not require women to become Satanic or perform a ritual to access needed health care, and aren’t selling merchandise advertising their services.

You are completely off your rocker with your posted screed. You don’t care about women. You care about your goofy and evil white supremacy lying temple.


DP. You seem to be missing the point.

Their objective really isn’t to help women; it’s to fuel outrage when religions get involved in women’s healthcare.

So you don’t like their approach but you have similar goals.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple white nationalism defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page, waah!" to this list.)


Anonymous wrote:How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You won’t provide timestamps to support your ridiculous claims because you are full of sh1t.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


I am not that person however, Satanic Temple isn't in charge, they are an optional group.

Red Republican MAGA Conservative politicians daily make decisions that affect us all. Which by the way is horrific. They are literally liars, criminals, grifters and downright Traitors to the US. From child brides to open carry to women dying currently daily because of medical issues that are none of Republicans' business.

While you may find that Temple is not to your liking we sure as hell stand with the place that supports women. Which by the way your boys are coming for everything women.

PRO CHOICE< PRO TEMPLE< PRO WOMEN

Wake up.



As several pages back: show us where women are dying daily. A link from each day that shows women are dying every single day.

Child brides? What are you talking about?
Open carry? New Mexico is an Open Carry State, meaning it is legal to carry a loaded weapon as long as it is not concealed. Why is the Satanic Temple opening their “medical clinic” in a state that allows it’s citizens to openly carry loaded weapons?

The Temple (which you are defending) is not defending women. New Mexico already allows telehealth abortion. Women in New Mexico can consult a medical provider using phone or computer and have pills mailed to their home.

https://www.plancpills.org/states/new-mexico#telehealth

What the Satanic Temple (which supports white nationalism, is financially opaque, sues former members into silence) is doing is fundraising off of girls and women in distress.

If a woman lives in a state with abortion prohibition or restriction, and she uses TST to obtain abortion pills, she can be prosecuted. The Satanic Temple will not use their resources to defend her in court. (They uses Alex Jones’ attorney anyway, so idk.)

I have posted a link to 13 telehealth abortion providers operating in NM that do not require women to become Satanic or perform a ritual to access needed health care, and aren’t selling merchandise advertising their services.

You are completely off your rocker with your posted screed. You don’t care about women. You care about your goofy and evil white supremacy lying temple.


DP. You seem to be missing the point.

Their objective really isn’t to help women; it’s to fuel outrage when religions get involved in women’s healthcare.

So you don’t like their approach but you have similar goals.


DP. You're deliberately missing the point. The point is to raise money and membership by forcing desperate women to fund the STC. So the STC can use desperate women's money for personal things and white nationalism.

Agree you're completely off your rocker.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You won’t provide timestamps to support your ridiculous claims because you are full of sh1t.


Satanic Temple and white nationalism defense strategies #1 and #6. FIFY.


Anonymous wrote:How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.
6. Gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page, waah!

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.

Anonymous
The Satanic Temple pays contractors to search the internet and find negative messages about TST and report/flag them.

[/img][img]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17042463/42/1/united-federation-of-churches-llc-v-johnson/


[/img][img]

" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />

https://the.satanic.wiki/images/7/78/D-1-GN-22-006797_-_Plaintiff%27s_Original_Petition_w_Ex_76AC6EC7_-_2022-11-23.pdf


They are an evil cult that supports white supremacy, misogyny, and uses women for political gain and to get donations.

People who support TST are all day suckers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You won’t provide timestamps to support your ridiculous claims because you are full of sh1t.


Satanic Temple and white nationalism defense strategies #1 and #6. FIFY.


Anonymous wrote:How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.
6. Gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page, waah!

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You continue to prove my point. Asking you for a timestamp to support your claim doesn’t make me a “white nationalist”.

You are completely full of sh1t.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You won’t provide timestamps to support your ridiculous claims because you are full of sh1t.


Are you a paid contractor for The Satanic Temple? Do you get money for lying, attacking people who point out the flaws of TST? Or are you just another brainwashed cult member?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lucien Greaves/ Doug Misicko/Doug Mesner admitted in court to taking money donated for “abortion rights” and using it for rent and personal expenses. He also admitted the the co-founder of The Satanic Temple, Malcolm Jarry, uses the donated money for personal expenses also. But nobody (not the Satanic Temple, not a bookeeper or accountant, keeps track of that money or it’s use.

Malcolm Jarry’s real name is Cevin Soling.

Lucien/Doug says he doesn’t keep track of the amount of funds donated for abortion advocacy he spends on himself, or the amounts Malcolm/ Cevin spends on himself.

Worth keeping in mind: if we were describing Christian televangelists or crisis pregnancy centers this way, these same people defending The Satanic Temple with “nothing to see here” would not be nearly so charitable waving off the red flags of a church-business-nonprofit.


Corrupt “religious” leaders? Shocker!


At least one of these Satanic Temple defenders is a troll. There’s also at least one serious ST defender.

The troll is almost as disgusting as the actual ST defender. How low does she go, defending a white nationalist group and insulting other posters just to get her troll kicks?


Who exactly do you think is defending ST? Timestamps?

Let’s check your reading comprehension.


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.


Timestamps?

Who specifically do you think is defending ST?


Dear white nationalist troll: I'm not going to waste my time fishing out timestamps for you when anyone (and that includes you) can find all five of these white nationalist defense tactics in the last page or two.

In answer to your second question, you've used these tactics in the last page or two, so that makes you a white nationalist.


So you are completely full of sh1t. Got it. Go away, troll.


Satanic Temple defense strategy #1. (Should add "gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page!" to this list.)


How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You won’t provide timestamps to support your ridiculous claims because you are full of sh1t.


Satanic Temple and white nationalism defense strategies #1 and #6. FIFY.


Anonymous wrote:How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.
6. Gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page, waah!

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.



You continue to prove my point. Asking you for a timestamp to support your claim doesn’t make me a “white nationalist”.

You are completely full of sh1t.


Satanic Temple white nationalism defense strategies #1 and #6. You're really working #6, so hope you appreciate the modification to it!

Anonymous wrote:How to defend Satanic Temple white nationalists without explicitly defending ST white nationalists.

1. Call anybody who criticizes ST white nationalism a troll, dumb, or other ad hominens.
2. Call the ST’s strategy “brilliant” and compare them to “Swiftian satire” to try to legitimize them.
3. Ignore any attempt to point out the coercive nature of ST’s “help” and “rituals”
4. Try to derail away from any discussion of the ST’s racist history (“pedos!”)
5. Bump and reply to old posts to try to redirect conversation.
6. Gimme timestamps because I'm incapable of scrolling back a page or remembering what I read and/or posted just yesterday, waah!

Yeah, we get it, openly defending white nationalism would get you banned from DCUM. So you guys started out this thread saying you wanted to join ST, how wonderful they were, etc. When the white nationalism was exposed, you guys switched to the various tactics above to keep defending and trying to legitimize them. No time stamps needed, you’ve used all five in just the last two pages.
Forum Index » Religion
Go to: