Books you "should" love, but just don't
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Tbh Catcher in the Rye is not meant for adults at all. No one past the age of 15 should be allowed to read it. |
Anonymous
I don’t think anyone “should” love Glennon Doyle books. |
Anonymous
I realized I hated her on the first book. It was so awful. It was a contrived story about a teenage suicide pact that I thought played on every scared housewife’s basest fears. Reading Lolita in Tehran was another disappointment. I’d heard such good things. But as I remember it, it just kept emphasizing over and over the audacity with which they were reading Lolita…in Tehran. |
Anonymous
| Little Women. I hated that book so much as a teenager and I still get mad when I think about how much time I wasted reading it and just drudging through it because I thought it had to get better. It didn't. It was just a long borefest and they keep making stupid movies about it over and over!! WHY?! |
Anonymous
Yes - anything by Jane Austen. Sorry there I said it. Bad memories of required HS reading 
|
Anonymous
*and little edit there whoops |