Wallstreet Feeder Schools (Per Capita)

[Anonymous]

Hahahahaha Duke boosters are hilarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DS played golf for Clemson University and majored in business. After graduation, he also attended MBA at Clemson. He got multiple job offers from GS, JP Morgan, etc... He is making a lot of money at the age of 29, enough to retire in about five years.

That’s rare if we are being absolutely honest.

Clemson is not a target by any means. Playing D1 golf was a huge help to your kid, not Clemson.

I posted previously about working on wall st for years. Clemson definitely didn’t help at all. It’s the D1 golf they’re interested in. Also, in wall st terms, unless he’s for jumped to a hedge fund, no one would consider 5 years of wall st pay retirement level

https://www.businessinsider.com/teach-bill-ackman-a-sport-and-he-might-hire-you-2012-5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

This is fabricated data. The true data would have HYPSM at the top 5. HYPSM confers a level of prestige that no other schools can match, and it opens every single possible door for its graduates.

hypsm prestige defense squad members are the most hilarious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

This is fabricated data. The true data would have HYPSM at the top 5. HYPSM confers a level of prestige that no other schools can match, and it opens every single possible door for its graduates.

hypsm prestige defense squad members are the most hilarious

This is the right data dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

This is fabricated data. The true data would have HYPSM at the top 5. HYPSM confers a level of prestige that no other schools can match, and it opens every single possible door for its graduates.

hypsm prestige defense squad members are the most hilarious

please don't reply to your own posts just to push your stupid phrase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not affiliated with either Columbia or Princeton but I have to say NYC seems more enticing than a boring NJ suburb.

Princeton is a lot nicer to live in than morning side heights, especially if you are an athlete.

Columbia students look like bug people — it’s weird.

Yes, if you are an athlete, Columbia is the only ivy with its line of outdoor sportswear and gear - Columbia Apparel, Outdoor Apparel & Products. How do you beat that?

In addition to that Columbia has its own broadcast network and record label. Who else can say that?

That’s amazing!!! Helps build school spirit. Wink.

Columbia is obviously the BEST

of the lower Ivys

You must have missed this post earlier in the thread:

Phrases people use that let me know they are unintelligent:

Anything racist
"I'm Just Saying"
"For All Intensive Purposes"
"I did my own research about vaccines"
"It is what it is"
"Snowflake", "Crotchfruit" or anything similar
"Lower Ivy"

I'm just saying....

Do NOT agree that using the descriptor "Lower Ivy" indicates lower intelligence given it refers to the reality that, in terms of prestige and ranking, some Ivy League institutions are stratified as "upper" while some are stratified as "lower".

Speaking of how Wall Street banks and and elite employers perceive these schools, which is the actual topic of this thread, here is a quote from a research article titled "Ivies, Extracurriculars, and Exclusion: Elite Employers' Use of Educational Credentials:" "Brown, Cornell, Dartmouth, and University of Pennsylvania (general studies) were frequently described as 'second tier' schools that were filled primarily with candidates who 'didn’t get in' to a super-elite school."

The article surveyed many of the employers from these elite Wall Street firms, and this was the general consensus among them. In Wall Street, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and Wharton are the Upper Ivies. The original data from this thread supports this too.

So you can call Columbia a lower ivy, and no one will stop you, but no one will believe your words either.

I'm pretty sure Columbia is a lower Ivy.

Lower Ivy still >>>> whatever school you went to, my dear

Yes, Columbia is a far better school that I attended but it is still a Lower Ivy (lower than HYP).

Lower than HYP and about the same as Penn

Not affiliated with either school but Columbia > Penn State. End of discussion.

Wharton > Columbia College / Penn A&S > Columbia Engineering > Penn State

I don't understand what criteria you used to compare liberal arts colleges, a business school and an engineering school. If you have some top-secret formula that allows you to objectively compare these three types of schools, share it with us!

Just street prestige

I think Columbia Engineering is same as CC and Penn, but agree all below Wharton

On the whole, Columbia's closest peer schools are Penn and Duke

Bingo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

These numbers are from linkedin? They look too small. The securities industry, a proxy for IBs, employs roughly 180k people in NY alone. The total of the above list is no more than 3k, or less than 1 percent of the total employees. So either a majority of the IB employees are not from the listed colleges, or the data source is too limited to draw any conclusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

These numbers are from linkedin? They look too small. The securities industry, a proxy for IBs, employs roughly 180k people in NY alone. The total of the above list is no more than 3k, or less than 1 percent of the total employees. So either a majority of the IB employees are not from the listed colleges, or the data source is too limited to draw any conclusion.

It’s only people working as analysts as thirteen or so firms. It’s a dumb list to use as a proxy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you calling per capita ranking BS... here's the ranking in raw numbers:

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-banking

1. UPenn (486)
2. NYU (302)
3. Columbia (267)
4. Harvard (254)
5. Cornell (245)
6. Georgetown (225)
7. UChicago (224)
8. Berkeley (203)
9. Michigan (194)
10. Yale (181)
11. Duke (146)
12. USC (144)
13. UT-Austin (142)
14. Notre Dame (136)
15. UVA (132)
16. Princeton (131)
17. Boston College (127)
18. Brown (122)
19. Dartmouth (119)
20. UCLA (111)
21. Stanford (110)
22. UNC-Chapel Hill (88)
23. Northwestern (84)
24. Vanderbilt (84)
25. Emory (82)
26. SMU (72)
27. WUSTL (53)
28. Middlebury (50)
29. MIT (49)
30. Northeastern (44)

These numbers are from linkedin? They look too small. The securities industry, a proxy for IBs, employs roughly 180k people in NY alone. The total of the above list is no more than 3k, or less than 1 percent of the total employees. So either a majority of the IB employees are not from the listed colleges, or the data source is too limited to draw any conclusion.

It’s only people working as analysts as thirteen or so firms. It’s a dumb list to use as a proxy.

This whole discussion is based on a dumb list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not affiliated with either Columbia or Princeton but I have to say NYC seems more enticing than a boring NJ suburb.

Princeton is a lot nicer to live in than morning side heights, especially if you are an athlete.

Columbia students look like bug people — it’s weird.

Yes, if you are an athlete, Columbia is the only ivy with its line of outdoor sportswear and gear - Columbia Apparel, Outdoor Apparel & Products. How do you beat that?

In addition to that Columbia has its own broadcast network and record label. Who else can say that?

That’s amazing!!! Helps build school spirit. Wink.

Columbia is obviously the BEST

of the lower Ivys

You must have missed this post earlier in the thread:

Phrases people use that let me know they are unintelligent:

Anything racist
"I'm Just Saying"
"For All Intensive Purposes"
"I did my own research about vaccines"
"It is what it is"
"Snowflake", "Crotchfruit" or anything similar
"Lower Ivy"

I'm just saying....

Do NOT agree that using the descriptor "Lower Ivy" indicates lower intelligence given it refers to the reality that, in terms of prestige and ranking, some Ivy League institutions are stratified as "upper" while some are stratified as "lower".

Speaking of how Wall Street banks and and elite employers perceive these schools, which is the actual topic of this thread, here is a quote from a research article titled "Ivies, Extracurriculars, and Exclusion: Elite Employers' Use of Educational Credentials:" "Brown, Cornell, Dartmouth, and University of Pennsylvania (general studies) were frequently described as 'second tier' schools that were filled primarily with candidates who 'didn’t get in' to a super-elite school."

The article surveyed many of the employers from these elite Wall Street firms, and this was the general consensus among them. In Wall Street, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and Wharton are the Upper Ivies. The original data from this thread supports this too.

So you can call Columbia a lower ivy, and no one will stop you, but no one will believe your words either.

I'm pretty sure Columbia is a lower Ivy.

Lower Ivy still >>>> whatever school you went to, my dear

Yes, Columbia is a far better school that I attended but it is still a Lower Ivy (lower than HYP).

Lower than HYP and about the same as Penn

Not affiliated with either school but Columbia > Penn State. End of discussion.

Wharton > Columbia College / Penn A&S > Columbia Engineering > Penn State

I don't understand what criteria you used to compare liberal arts colleges, a business school and an engineering school. If you have some top-secret formula that allows you to objectively compare these three types of schools, share it with us!

Wharton > Columbia College / Penn A&S > Columbia Engineering > Penn State > UPenn (-Wharton).

The objective formula... is called DCUM logic... or Fuzzy logic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is fabricated data. The true data would have HYPSM at the top 5. HYPSM confers a level of prestige that no other schools can match, and it opens every single possible door for its graduates .

Including Narnia, evidently.

Including PP’s shit hoe, evidently.

[Anonymous]

HYPSM sociology grads are better surgeons and doctors than Johns Hopkins trained surgeons and doctors. Why? Because of prestige of HYPSM! Damn prestige is everything. No brains necessary. No relevant study or training necessary. HYPSM degree regardless of major is the best for every profession, including for house cleaning and lawn mowing. I am looking for a house cleaner and a lawn mower. Do you have any HYPSM graduates you could recommend. I want to employ god damned best house cleaner and the best lawnmower. Nothing but the best for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is fabricated data. The true data would have HYPSM at the top 5. HYPSM confers a level of prestige that no other schools can match, and it opens every single possible door for its graduates .

Including Narnia, evidently.

Including PP’s shit hoe, evidently.

Hoe no, we inarticulate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HYPSM sociology grads are better surgeons and doctors than Johns Hopkins trained surgeons and doctors. Why? Because of prestige of HYPSM! Damn prestige is everything. No brains necessary. No relevant study or training necessary. HYPSM degree regardless of major is the best for every profession, including for house cleaning and lawn mowing. I am looking for a house cleaner and a lawn mower. Do you have any HYPSM graduates you could recommend. I want to employ god damned best house cleaner and the best lawnmower. Nothing but the best for me.

I almost miss your insipid prestige defense squad comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYPSM sociology grads are better surgeons and doctors than Johns Hopkins trained surgeons and doctors. Why? Because of prestige of HYPSM! Damn prestige is everything. No brains necessary. No relevant study or training necessary. HYPSM degree regardless of major is the best for every profession, including for house cleaning and lawn mowing. I am looking for a house cleaner and a lawn mower. Do you have any HYPSM graduates you could recommend. I want to employ god damned best house cleaner and the best lawnmower. Nothing but the best for me.

I almost miss your insipid prestige defense squad comment.

It’s okay! You are excused.