Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe the hysteria about this poor lady who wanted to release a sweet Mother’s Day photo with her kids.

There's always groups of people who rely heavily on denial. Look, she is likely not dying but there is a lot of unusual and conflicting data and behavior emerging from KP and the royal family. We don't know what the hell it is yet...but it's something.

Or…we take it at face value, knowing it’s a little sus, until we hear more. There are always groups of people manufacturing wild conspiracy theories. We don’t know what the hell why…but it’s something.

I don't know what taking something at "face value" means when there are curiosities and inconsistencies that are objectively noteworthy and have been noted by many reputable sources as highly unusual. (AP killing pictures from a Royal source, A popular royal not being seen despite rising public concern, Kensington palace responding to gossip, etc). Also the term conspiracy theories is now overused. If you disagree with certain points, by all means comment. But lumping us all together as a single crazy group seems intellectually lazy. It's also counter to some of the thoughtful dialog people have offered here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Respectfully, if the British Media isn’t going to get to the bottom of it, the American media is making it clear that they will. #KateGate

https://x.com/tudorchick1501/status/1767585033475227896

https://x.com/maxlunc/status/1767223109277319221

Don’t worry the American women, and specifically the women of DCurbanMom have this….

Thank God. I can sleep peacefully tonight

[Anonymous]

Kate was seen hours after giving birth to her first child in full makeup , high heels, and apparently wig.

It’s not like her to just disappear into the abyss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone link to the tmz story? i can't find.

[url] ttps://www.tmz.com/2024/03/04/kate-middleton-seen-spotted-public-first-time-mystery-hospitalization/?adid=social-tw

[Anonymous]

Times have changed. It appears that her husband may be pushing her out and trashing her public image.

[Anonymous]

https://www.tmz.com/2024/03/04/kate-middleton-seen-spotted-public-first-time-mystery-hospitalization/?adid=social-tw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe the hysteria about this poor lady who wanted to release a sweet Mother’s Day photo with her kids.

What is sweet about deception or even worse ??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Times have changed. It appears that her husband may be pushing her out and trashing her public image.

Do you think there is already someone else?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Times have changed. It appears that her husband may be pushing her out and trashing her public image.

Very interesting to see if he gets away with. It's a new time and people know how crazy families work. This could be his downfall. Assuming she gets well and healthy or is well and healthy and think she will be fine.

[Anonymous]

Damn. This thread is giving the Hi-LAHR-eeeya Baldwin thread some serious competition. That one made it up to 500+ pages.

[Anonymous]

Moral of the story: don't marry anyone who had a very damaging childhood, who has a mentally ill parent or who has unresolved issues manifesting in a temper. At some point, they may aggressively devalue YOU in displacement. Even if he may someday be the King of England. Ime, if you are a caring and nurturing parent, he may even become jealous of the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s the Hilaria Baldwin story?

Oh, girl—you gotta search for that thread. It is a wild ride.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Times have changed. It appears that her husband may be pushing her out and trashing her public image.

Very interesting to see if he gets away with. It's a new time and people know how crazy families work. This could be his downfall. Assuming she gets well and healthy or is well and healthy and think she will be fine.

I hope she will be fine. I am no longer convinced she will be a member of the royal family however. That National Enquirer piece is pretty vicious.

William was a parentified child, used to soothe his mentally ill borderline mother. Seems he has a lot of anger about that, perhaps.

[Anonymous]

For the record, I think the ED theory makes sense based on Kate’s extreme thinness alone. I don’t think it’s necessary to add a coma to the story, or ruptured organs, but maybe. There also may or may not be marital trouble, as evidenced by William’s weird behavior, the completely unnecessary and bizarre attempt to photoshop her and her kids into a picture “taken by William,” and the palace throwing Kate under the bus.

But playing devil’s advocate…
- could this be a fourth pregnancy of an older woman, as somebody upthread suggested? It’s “abdominal” for sure. They wouldn’t want to make an announcement until she was out of the first trimester, plus she has hg. Her face might well swell.
- maybe she didn’t stay at the clinic for more than a few days, and that’s why we didn’t see William going more than once.

Happy to be proven wrong and/or called ignorant…. Well, the inane princess worshipper can keep away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story: don't marry anyone who had a very damaging childhood, who has a mentally ill parent or who has unresolved issues manifesting in a temper. At some point, they may aggressively devalue YOU in displacement. Even if he may someday be the King of England. Ime, if you are a caring and nurturing parent, he may even become jealous of the children.

Better yet, don’t marry into a family of leopards that have eaten people’s faces and expect them to not eat your face.