APS: Elementary Walk Zone surveys out

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It isn't a "weird" thought. The two schools are not the same.

1. The calendar is different. Many families don't want to send their kids and live under that calendar.

2. The UMC community buy-in is different resulting in parents who transfer out because they don't like the school's scores and academics.

3. The leadership at the school is different. Barrett is known to have a strong principle. Barcroft was on its way up with community involvement and scores when the well-liked principle retired and lots of her loyal staff left - school then went back downhill. New principle was terrible according to many and she is gone with a new one installed. Hope she is better.

4. UMC scores are a bit lower at Barcroft.

If you don't see a difference, then you don't care to. Some of us do and want to see improvements at Barcroft.


The sores and community involvement WHERE ON THEIR WAY UP under the previous long-time principal --- WHILE THE MODIFIED CALENDAR WAS IN PLACE. It wasn't the calendar that caused the decline after that - it was the new principal. Give the current principal a legitimate chance (WITH the calendar) and see what happens.


Nobody said the calendar caused the decline. We're saying it continues to cause families to seek options outside the neighborhood, and THAT is a huge waste, especially when the calendar has not proven to be an academic benefit and is more difficult and costly to administer. If you get rid of the calendar, you remove yet another barrier to neighborhood buy-in. The kids are here. Let them have a regular neighborhood school.


I am skeptical that a traditional calendar will suddenly make all those UMC families send their kids to Barcroft. The calendar is a legitimate reason for some; but it is an excuse for most who opt out. People still look at FRL rates and test scores.


Sure, it's not going to be a panacea. Families who have already committed to an option school aren't going to come back unless it has not been a positive experience. But there are families with kids yet to enter school and there are families who are at Barcroft now but don't love the calendar who may leave. It's just removing another negative, another mental barrier. People would get over the funny calendar if the school had high test scores and a great reputation. But it doesn't, so why not change what you can? Why wouldn't you want to do that? I still have not seen real evidence that there is some educational benefit to the modified calendar. But the cost of keeping the school open and busing 300 neighborhood kids to other schools is clear.


We'd be bussing 200 or more kids elsewhere anyway, because Barcroft doesn't have the capacity for 700-800 kids. If the calendar is only one barrier that MIGHT make a few more UMC families stay, I don't see a significant motivation to eliminate the calendar as a means to change demographics. It isn't going to make significantly more difference than what was happening several years ago when Barcroft was "on the rise" as referenced earlier in this topic. It started to see buy-in under the modified calendar but the change in leadership killed it - not because of the calendar. Perhaps if APS did more outreach and recruitment to make ED families realize the opportunities and advantages some of the option programs would offer their kids, they could get more of them to go to the option programs and create a better balance of economic demographics that way.


No, get rid of the calendar to SAVE MONEY that we really need for other things. Even if they continue to bus 200 kids who option out, that's 100 less kids on buses. If Barcroft is a neighborhood school, it needs to have a neighborhood school calendar. If APS wants to keep the calendar, they need to make it an option school.
Anonymous
There are ED Barcroft families who transfer to option schools, particularly Claremont.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There are ED Barcroft families who transfer to option schools, particularly Claremont.


Yes; but the point is about UMC families opting out. If you increase the #/proportion of ED families opting out, fewer UMC families would be able to opt out.
Anonymous
There's is no reason that APS should be maitiang a calendar that has ANYONE trying to avoid it. That is a waste, and if we're tightening our belts, it should be among the first things to go.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are ED Barcroft families who transfer to option schools, particularly Claremont.


Yes; but the point is about UMC families opting out. If you increase the #/proportion of ED families opting out, fewer UMC families would be able to opt out.


They'd still be able to move or go private. That's why trying to create more integrated schools by curtailing UMC access to option schools are bound to backfire and create even more segregated schools for the disadvantaged, who can't just move or go private.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are ED Barcroft families who transfer to option schools, particularly Claremont.


Yes; but the point is about UMC families opting out. If you increase the #/proportion of ED families opting out, fewer UMC families would be able to opt out.


They'd still be able to move or go private. That's why trying to create more integrated schools by curtailing UMC access to option schools are bound to backfire and create even more segregated schools for the disadvantaged, who can't just move or go private.


We are one of the so called UMC families - we can't move. We've invested too much in our house. It's way cheaper to demand APS give us what we want.
Anonymous
Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.


Dubious claim. Barcroft is a very walkable neighborhood school. ATS is an option school at the intersection of two major roads that elementary aged students are not permitted to cross.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.


Dubious claim. Barcroft is a very walkable neighborhood school. ATS is an option school at the intersection of two major roads that elementary aged students are not permitted to cross.


Yeah, APS is all about walkable neighborhood schools these days. Doubtful that they would move an option school to a more walkable location.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.


Dubious claim. Barcroft is a very walkable neighborhood school. ATS is an option school at the intersection of two major roads that elementary aged students are not permitted to cross.


Yeah, APS is all about walkable neighborhood schools these days. Doubtful that they would move an option school to a more walkable location.


oh that goes out of the window quickly when it doesn't suit their agenda anymore. everyone thinks their school is more walkable, yes, including Bluemont folks who can't wait to walk to the ATS site. so, the least desirable (yet very walkable) school gets the boot.
Anonymous
How about moving ATS to the Barcroft but adding neighborhood preference?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How about moving ATS to the Barcroft but adding neighborhood preference?


Avoiding neighborhood preference at choice schools is exactly why they are rearranging school boundaries now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How about moving ATS to the Barcroft but adding neighborhood preference?


NOT happening until ATS@Barcroft loses its appeal and has seats to fill.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.


Dubious claim. Barcroft is a very walkable neighborhood school. ATS is an option school at the intersection of two major roads that elementary aged students are not permitted to cross.


Yeah, APS is all about walkable neighborhood schools these days. Doubtful that they would move an option school to a more walkable location.


oh that goes out of the window quickly when it doesn't suit their agenda anymore. everyone thinks their school is more walkable, yes, including Bluemont folks who can't wait to walk to the ATS site. so, the least desirable (yet very walkable) school gets the boot.


So, you think that because Alcova Heights wants to go to Fleet that APS will cave and then make it look as if it's not white flight by declaring Barcroft an option school, sending alcova to fleet and the poor kids on the other side of the Barcroft zone to other nearby schools with high FARMs rates? You don't by chance live in alcova heights, do you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Barcroft boundary is to be redrawn to move neighborhood kids to Randolph/Barrett/Fleet, and an options school - most likely ATS, will move to the site.

You heard it here first.


Dubious claim. Barcroft is a very walkable neighborhood school. ATS is an option school at the intersection of two major roads that elementary aged students are not permitted to cross.


Yeah, APS is all about walkable neighborhood schools these days. Doubtful that they would move an option school to a more walkable location.


oh that goes out of the window quickly when it doesn't suit their agenda anymore. everyone thinks their school is more walkable, yes, including Bluemont folks who can't wait to walk to the ATS site. so, the least desirable (yet very walkable) school gets the boot.


So the Bluemont people don't like their short walk to Ashlawn? Or don't like Ashlawn? What am I missing here?
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: