Meghan Markle twerking video

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.


This.

And she’s smart enough to know her Q score hangs on her social media followers and views coupled with more mainstream media mentions. She’s boosting her metrics whenever her haters click. This thread is serving a purpose: driving people to links.

That’s fine I guess. If this is how she and Harry want to make money, then that’s their choice.

I’m just surprised that it continues to work…and that they seemingly don’t mind that they are equally loved and hated.

The video is dumb, not cute. It seems heavily produced. They probably had someone shoot multiple takes. Private moments should be private moments.

I don’t get all the surrogacy rumors. She definitely gained weight and looks pregnant all over her body. I’m sure someone can pull up pics when she was pregnant and was clearly retaining water (puffy face, round shoulders/arms, etc).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


You’re either a troll, had your kids by c-section, are a man, or are misremembering. The “lumps” are the monitors they put on you to keep track of the baby’s heartbeat.


The monitors have cords. You are wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


You’re either a troll, had your kids by c-section, are a man, or are misremembering. The “lumps” are the monitors they put on you to keep track of the baby’s heartbeat.


The monitors have cords. You are wrong.


They had wireless monitors 18 years when I was pregnant. It wasn’t great technology or in heavy usage then. I am sure the princess can get the latest and the best.
Anonymous
She / they are desperate and thirsty. Their reality TV show was universally mocked. They have no family, they have no real friends, they have no careers. They’re bored and lonely grifters living in a mansion, likely doom scrolling on their phones and iPads most of the day.
Anonymous
Oh. It was likely real. However, I could hardly walk across a parking lot the days I gave birth. I certainly was not up to dancing.
Anonymous
The people who think was not really pregnant are Qanon level nuts.

That said, she is a terrible person.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.


TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….


Define relevant. Nobody would recognize her in an average town in America. She’s a nobody. A sideshow some gossip readers laugh at when they see her in a tabloid? Dream big.


You would.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She / they are desperate and thirsty. Their reality TV show was universally mocked. They have no family, they have no real friends, they have no careers. They’re bored and lonely grifters living in a mansion, likely doom scrolling on their phones and iPads most of the day.


Oof. The projection here.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She / they are desperate and thirsty. Their reality TV show was universally mocked. They have no family, they have no real friends, they have no careers. They’re bored and lonely grifters living in a mansion, likely doom scrolling on their phones and iPads most of the day.


You left out "Godless" but dead on with no wasted words. You remind me of myself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.


In notable ways, she's not so different from her dad snd her half siblings.


She is not. In fact, she shares many similarities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


You’re either a troll, had your kids by c-section, are a man, or are misremembering. The “lumps” are the monitors they put on you to keep track of the baby’s heartbeat.


The monitors have cords. You are wrong.


They had wireless monitors 18 years when I was pregnant. It wasn’t great technology or in heavy usage then. I am sure the princess can get the latest and the best.


She is not a princess. She is a duchess.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.


TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….


Define relevant. Nobody would recognize her in an average town in America. She’s a nobody. A sideshow some gossip readers laugh at when they see her in a tabloid? Dream big.


You would.


I absolutely would not. When she’s not in a $10,000 dress with professional hair, makeup and toadie editors and photographers, she looks like an unremarkable basic middle class white mom. She doesn’t have stunning good looks or some captivating aura. And she’s not famous for anything anymore. Maybe at the height of the wedding stuff 7 years ago people would be buzzing? But that was pre-Covid. The world has evolved. Nobody cares about this shit anymore.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.


TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….


Define relevant. Nobody would recognize her in an average town in America. She’s a nobody. A sideshow some gossip readers laugh at when they see her in a tabloid? Dream big.


You would.


I absolutely would not. When she’s not in a $10,000 dress with professional hair, makeup and toadie editors and photographers, she looks like an unremarkable basic middle class white mom. She doesn’t have stunning good looks or some captivating aura. And she’s not famous for anything anymore. Maybe at the height of the wedding stuff 7 years ago people would be buzzing? But that was pre-Covid. The world has evolved. Nobody cares about this shit anymore.


You care, and you appear to be invested. Otherwise, you wouldn’t be here.

And I have no doubt that you’d recognize her in the wild. Assuming you’re the same PP, your posts in this string prove your investment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.


In notable ways, she's not so different from her dad snd her half siblings.


+1 Genetics won't be denied.


They are all a mess and she is most definitely a Markle. Married the most publicly racist trash from that family. Wanted to do public progressive service and is selling jam adjacent slop using rip offs of 90s Eternity ads.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.


This.

And she’s smart enough to know her Q score hangs on her social media followers and views coupled with more mainstream media mentions. She’s boosting her metrics whenever her haters click. This thread is serving a purpose: driving people to links.

That’s fine I guess. If this is how she and Harry want to make money, then that’s their choice.

I’m just surprised that it continues to work…and that they seemingly don’t mind that they are equally loved and hated.

The video is dumb, not cute. It seems heavily produced. They probably had someone shoot multiple takes. Private moments should be private moments.

I don’t get all the surrogacy rumors. She definitely gained weight and looks pregnant all over her body. I’m sure someone can pull up pics when she was pregnant and was clearly retaining water (puffy face, round shoulders/arms, etc).


I love a good conspiracy theory and have read how celebs such as Beyoncé get into character and take (I think) thyroid meds to bloat, gain.

Faux pregnancies besides Beyonce include the Kelly Preston Travolta, Sarah Palin and I earnestly believe, Megan Markle. Also they brought a doll baby to the introductory Archie event.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: