EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

She's a narcissist too.

[Anonymous]

I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

So the FBI, LA DCFS, and the judge involved are just a bunch of men and women conned by a pretty, successful man. Only you, who seems to be completely impartial and unbiased, can make a fair determination? You seem way too emotionally invested here and insulting of other professionals. Why should we listen to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

Why even bring the past up indeed. Why is her past irrelevant but his is not? This is such a bizarre post.

Because his past caused physical harm to the kids....

Why were there no criminal charges?

Not being charged doesn't mean an incident wasn't committed. I am not surprised the FBI wrote a probable cause and it was dropped at the attorneys office.At the time they said she wasn't forthcoming and was hesitant about him being charged. If she and the kids pulled out then there was no case.

I go back and forth about her wanting accountability. I would have moved on but I am also not a public figure and mynEX doesn't have a PR team that is repeating saying nothing happened. I kind of get it. She got the FBI to do an internal investigation and admit they handled it wrongly and that confirmation means something for her.

Ok. Seems like this is all about the feels and not about the facts. Carry on with your multi paragraphs screeds and fan fiction.

Do you have any idea of the rate of domestic violence in this country? Do you have any idea how little of it gets prosecuted, ESPECIALLY when the perpetrators are well heeled? As a former prosecutor who has met literally hundreds of prosecutors from all over the country, I can attest to how many of them are ambitious gutless wonders who wouldn't touch such a case with a ten foot pole.

That doesn't mean for a hot minute that Pitt didn't abuse his wife and kids. Prosecutors nolle prosequi on rape and child and partner abuse investigations with more than adequate probable cause ALL THE TIME because they are the hardest cases to win and most prosecutors care more about their win/loss record than about actually serving victims.

Do you know why rape and child and partner abuse cases are the hardest cases to win? Because there are so many people like you, and the others posting in this thread, who end up on juries. Apologists for pretty men. Oh, that pretty man couldn't have beaten and choked his wife. That pretty man couldn't have beaten his child. That pretty man would never rape a child.

Makes me SICK.

DP that fact one (or the same BP stan imo) went on about about how handsome he is in previous pages just proves your last point lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

You think you are pretty good at reading people you have never ever met IRL? Okay then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

So the FBI, LA DCFS, and the judge involved are just a bunch of men and women conned by a pretty, successful man. Only you, who seems to be completely impartial and unbiased, can make a fair determination? You seem way too emotionally invested here and insulting of other professionals. Why should we listen to you?

Well the judge was disqualified and DCFS did reprimand him. What do you think would have happened if he didn't agree to their plan of continuing the supervised visitations. Sounds like they actually did their job.

[Anonymous]

All built around the marriage that Angelina is crazy.

They’re all reading the same script, narcissists. I’m not the PP who wrote the previous response re: abuse and “respectable” men- I agree with you completely

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

So the FBI, LA DCFS, and the judge involved are just a bunch of men and women conned by a pretty, successful man. Only you, who seems to be completely impartial and unbiased, can make a fair determination? You seem way too emotionally invested here and insulting of other professionals. Why should we listen to you?

Well the judge was disqualified and DCFS did reprimand him. What do you think would have happened if he didn't agree to their plan of continuing the supervised visitations. Sounds like they actually did their job.

You don't really have a leg to stand on unless your next accusation is to accuse the FBI of corruption. But go on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

So the FBI, LA DCFS, and the judge involved are just a bunch of men and women conned by a pretty, successful man. Only you, who seems to be completely impartial and unbiased, can make a fair determination? You seem way too emotionally invested here and insulting of other professionals. Why should we listen to you?

Well the judge was disqualified and DCFS did reprimand him. What do you think would have happened if he didn't agree to their plan of continuing the supervised visitations. Sounds like they actually did their job.

You don't really have a leg to stand on unless your next accusation is to accuse the FBI of corruption. But go on.

Agencies often fail victims but that doesn't mean it's always corruption. That's a sensationalized way to look it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

So the FBI, LA DCFS, and the judge involved are just a bunch of men and women conned by a pretty, successful man. Only you, who seems to be completely impartial and unbiased, can make a fair determination? You seem way too emotionally invested here and insulting of other professionals. Why should we listen to you?

Well the judge was disqualified and DCFS did reprimand him. What do you think would have happened if he didn't agree to their plan of continuing the supervised visitations. Sounds like they actually did their job.

You don't really have a leg to stand on unless your next accusation is to accuse the FBI of corruption. But go on.

Agencies often fail victims but that doesn't mean it's always corruption. That's a sensationalized way to look it

Or maybe things aren't exactly as she said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. But if there’s no corroboration from anyone besides her kids (the pilots, Nannies, housekeepers, etc.) and no documented abuse (police reports, emails, texts), then it’s her word against his. I feel for her but she’d be better off just moving on.

I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but thank you just the same for proving my point.

Women and children are rarely believed by jurors when the accused is a pretty, successful man.

The way I see it her getting those documents and people being held accountable also validates the kids experience. Many mothers would the same thing if we had the financial help to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is nutty. Plus she steals other wives men. Dirtbag. Brad is smart to on from her.

Mentally ill with severe daddy issues. Every guy she's targeted has been married or engaged. It's some weird fixation, source of pride, for her to screw a guy already committed to someone else. One of "those women".

She had a drug problem. She used to make out with her own brother. She was bat-sh*t crazy with Billy Bob (who was engaged to Laura Dern and blindsided when Angie moved in).

She constantly reinvents herself, so much so it feels like an act. The vixen Angie, the Mother Theresa Angie, The Red cross Angie, etc, etc. She severely lacked empathy along with Brad when right as he left Aniston--literally right after he left-- they took out a full page Vogue magazine spread posing as a family with kids.

It's hard to really believe anything with a person with that track record. It could be true, who knows...but somebody that has shown they are dishonest to begin with, willing to cheat and treat people with zero empathy...

I always think JA was the lucky one in this sh*t show. That traveling gypsy freak show and chaos---and then the implosion---Jen has close friends and a life.

Angie needs $ and was selling art work, etc.

And Brad's mother and family absolutely loved Jen. Mom was still hanging out with and calling her after the divorce.

So what? Brad's mother, the counselor, raised him to be the druggie, drunk, emotionally and physically abusive husband and father he is. Because yes, being drugged and drunk all the time in a marriage and as a dad is ABUSIVE. And because he admits those things, I have zero qualms believing not only Jolie but also one of the kids who has publicly asserted he was physically abusive.

The Pitt fan club in this thread is gross. I'm no big fan of Jolie as an actor, I acknowledge she is more than a little bit weird and I find her actions unsurprising considering her messed up childhood - but for the record Aniston had a similarly messed up childhood and her parents were both failures at some level, which explains them both being attracted to an addict narcissist like Pitt.

As for the kids - they don't seem any worse or better than any other celebrity kids. As someone else mentioned, neither parent has a college degree - Pitt dropped out only two credits short of completion, how stupid is that? - so there isn't parental pressure to go that path if they aren't ready or don't want it. Why is that a bad thing? A lot of parent pressure their kids to go to college when they aren't ready or sure what they want and many of those kids go deeply into student loan debt in the process. These kids have wealthy parents and are being given space to figure out who they are - there is nothing wrong with that except from the perspective of driven DCUM parents whose kids probably never had space to breathe and just be after kindergarten.

Maybe Jolie isn't a great parent, but she gets kudos for putting her parenting above all else since the divorce.

So many threads on here with women and men wondering about their dating prospects post divorce often when they haven't even left the marriage yet - people who still have minor children to raise.

I don't know why divorced people with minor children are dating at all - especially divorced women. But then, I spent years working in law enforcement and as a child advocate and I know the statistics on who it is that perpetrates most abuse of all kinds on children - outside of the parents themselves, the primary abusers of children are stepparents and/or boyfriend or girlfriend of the parents.

Jolie is putting her kids ahead of her love life, so she has clearly matured from the foolish young woman everyone keeps seeing her as so many years later. She has often said that becoming a parent changed her life utterly - as so many parents say. She thought she found a worthy dad for her kids in Pitt, and she learned the hard way that he wasn't really. Now she's focused on the kids and hasn't even really dated. And yet she's being vilified.

Hypocrisy.

It took her 12 years to realize it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is nutty. Plus she steals other wives men. Dirtbag. Brad is smart to on from her.

Mentally ill with severe daddy issues. Every guy she's targeted has been married or engaged. It's some weird fixation, source of pride, for her to screw a guy already committed to someone else. One of "those women".

She had a drug problem. She used to make out with her own brother. She was bat-sh*t crazy with Billy Bob (who was engaged to Laura Dern and blindsided when Angie moved in).

She constantly reinvents herself, so much so it feels like an act. The vixen Angie, the Mother Theresa Angie, The Red cross Angie, etc, etc. She severely lacked empathy along with Brad when right as he left Aniston--literally right after he left-- they took out a full page Vogue magazine spread posing as a family with kids.

It's hard to really believe anything with a person with that track record. It could be true, who knows...but somebody that has shown they are dishonest to begin with, willing to cheat and treat people with zero empathy...

I always think JA was the lucky one in this sh*t show. That traveling gypsy freak show and chaos---and then the implosion---Jen has close friends and a life.

Angie needs $ and was selling art work, etc.

And Brad's mother and family absolutely loved Jen. Mom was still hanging out with and calling her after the divorce.

So what? Brad's mother, the counselor, raised him to be the druggie, drunk, emotionally and physically abusive husband and father he is. Because yes, being drugged and drunk all the time in a marriage and as a dad is ABUSIVE. And because he admits those things, I have zero qualms believing not only Jolie but also one of the kids who has publicly asserted he was physically abusive.

The Pitt fan club in this thread is gross. I'm no big fan of Jolie as an actor, I acknowledge she is more than a little bit weird and I find her actions unsurprising considering her messed up childhood - but for the record Aniston had a similarly messed up childhood and her parents were both failures at some level, which explains them both being attracted to an addict narcissist like Pitt.

As for the kids - they don't seem any worse or better than any other celebrity kids. As someone else mentioned, neither parent has a college degree - Pitt dropped out only two credits short of completion, how stupid is that? - so there isn't parental pressure to go that path if they aren't ready or don't want it. Why is that a bad thing? A lot of parent pressure their kids to go to college when they aren't ready or sure what they want and many of those kids go deeply into student loan debt in the process. These kids have wealthy parents and are being given space to figure out who they are - there is nothing wrong with that except from the perspective of driven DCUM parents whose kids probably never had space to breathe and just be after kindergarten.

Maybe Jolie isn't a great parent, but she gets kudos for putting her parenting above all else since the divorce.

So many threads on here with women and men wondering about their dating prospects post divorce often when they haven't even left the marriage yet - people who still have minor children to raise.

I don't know why divorced people with minor children are dating at all - especially divorced women. But then, I spent years working in law enforcement and as a child advocate and I know the statistics on who it is that perpetrates most abuse of all kinds on children - outside of the parents themselves, the primary abusers of children are stepparents and/or boyfriend or girlfriend of the parents.

Jolie is putting her kids ahead of her love life, so she has clearly matured from the foolish young woman everyone keeps seeing her as so many years later. She has often said that becoming a parent changed her life utterly - as so many parents say. She thought she found a worthy dad for her kids in Pitt, and she learned the hard way that he wasn't really. Now she's focused on the kids and hasn't even really dated. And yet she's being vilified.

Hypocrisy.

TL,DR. Does Angelina really have this many devoted fans?

Please. Did you miss how many devoted Brad who refuse to believe he did anything wrong and demand proof while they freely criticize their kids?

He was investigated by the FBI and Family Services. No charges imply innocence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

8 years of divorce proceedings and allegations after allegations tells us what kind of person she is.