Sure, Jan. Just look at the comments from MCPS teachers in threads like these. They're clearly not above yelling at a child and calling him stupid. |
It’s M4L nonsense. |
| Silver spring goin silver spring |
What exactly did you do? |
|
“Cry for help.” CPS should investigate the homes of the kids who are violent in school. One child at my dd’s school was violent and showed no control, beating up kids, swearing in class, hurling chairs and desks. Said teachers contacting his dad didn’t matter. His dad taught him to fight and would take him to McDonalds if he got in trouble.Turns out dad was busted for child porn and soliciting sex from a minor, and he was more than likely a victim.
White. Not poor. |
That is truly terrible. Ultimately, though, CPS investigations almost always turn up very little. I’m not saying don’t do them, and I think we can entertain looking at households where children act out, but there is most likely zero legal probably cause in a CPS investigation to uncover much. |
I’m going to further clarify here that by act out, I mean violently. Also, by looking at households, I mean a simple likely voluntary interview. |
Most of this wouldn't have come up in a CPS investigation. |
| As an admin, let me remind you these “problem children” are protected under laws. Expulsion, suspension and exclusion are absolute last resorts and a lot of documentation and sign-off’s are needed. It rarely happens. Everything is done to keep the child in class, least restrictive environment, and minimizing learning instruction. These protections include ADHD, ED, mental illnesses along with learning disabilities. You might not like it but those children have just as much right as your child to be at school. Having said that, that is why all three of my children are in private schools. |
This really sums it up. So many administrators aren't going to help teachers and will watch as teachers are assaulted over and over again and are fine that kids are witnessing violence every day that really affects them. Students aren't feeling safe at school. The least restrictive environment is different for every student who is in special education. It is the least restrictive environment WHENEVER POSSIBLE that works for the student to receive educational benefit and keep everyone safe. The law states "...special classes, separate schooling or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability of a child is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.” [20 U.S.C. Sec. 1412(a)(5)(A); 34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.114; Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56342(b).] A student who is incredibly violent in a general education classroom shouldn't be in a general education classroom because it is not the least restrictive environment for that student because it cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Some students just can't cope with being with 20 to 25 other kids in a class and need to be in a class with 8 students where they are working on emotional regulation. A good administrator does everything in his or her power to make this happen. |
LMAO!
Wow. I guess at least you're honest? Sucks for the rest of us who'd like your kids and teachers to not be assaulted or traumatized in school everyday. But hey, at least your kids are good!! |
| My kids went to SCES many years ago, but I am really surprised by these reactions. Why don't you all organize yourselves and actually do something to help. There may be an issue with the principle, but clearly more support for the teachers in the classroom is needed. You all are supposed to be a community. |
So volunteers should be used to solve critical operational gaps? Have you lost your mind? |
The only thing a parent volunteer could do is engage the other 24 kids in the class, or some subsection of them. Letting an untrained parent interact with a child who has already driven one teacher out of the profession, and hospitalized another, is a terrible idea and absolutely rife for litigation. |
The key phrase there is "such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily." The issue is that MCPS doesn't want to provide those supplementary aids and services. So even if you can find a principal who wants to get rid of a kid, it is going to be pretty easy for the parents to challenge an alternative placement until they've been provided and failed. |