Voluntarily taking out a student loan to major in gender theory and then unsurprisingly failing to pay your debts is not quite the same as trying to save the economy after being hit by a once a century plague, is it? |
+1 This. Lots of European countries fund undergraduate education fully or have colleges that are so much lower in cost than the USA. This is a good policy. |
No, schools only have that "freedom" because of subsidized government loans and their ability to fleece families for everything they got. And the word "investment" does not exactly come to mind when a school wastes precious tuition dollars on gilded luxury dorms and massage parlors for football players. |
Every 3-4 years now a new crop of graduates will demand a similar bail-out. And colleges will just keep jacking up tuition knowing that the gov will eventually have to forgive that debt. It's actually making the problem of college affordability wore. |
I worked my way through college. Took me 6 years, but no dept. It is totally entitlement for these younger kids. Don’t take out loans if you can’t afford them. I don’t like that my tax dollars are going to this. |
I do like that my tax dollars are going to this, even if my kids are too young to benefit. It's good for our country, and good for the well-being of young people building their futures. See how democracy works? Taxes are the price we pay for living in a civilized society. |
K. But the Europeans are not dumb enough to think that “college is for everyone.” As a result they can develop highly skilled tradesmen and educate their relatively small number of academically superior students for free. You’re right, this is a very effective model. But it requires a separate vocational tract for most high school students and national entrance exams. You still cool with this? |
How were they saving the economy by giving corporate welfare to the rich and connected? Evaluations of the PPP program show that the vast majority of funds went to the business owners and shareholder rather than the workers. At least this student loan program is going to lower income young people with debt. That's fine with me. |
Because you got a break and they didn’t. It sucks. I should have taken out a loan instead of working my ass off. |
Not all teachers. Only the ones working in low income schools/districts. I didn't start teaching in my low income district and school until I had paid off all of my loans so I didn't benefit from the loan forgiveness. |
Are you under the impression that college in the USA is "for everyone"? 60% of high school grads enroll in some form of higher ed, and many of those in 2 year community colleges that are more vocationally focused. You don't need a separate vocational "tract" whatever that means, although that already exists in certain school districts for kids who have the interest. |
If you’d majored in business or economics instead of theatre you’d understand who creates jobs in this country. You’d also have paid your loans off already all on your own and be all growns up. |
| Can someone explain what is meant by predatory loans? That term makes it sound like loan companies are making people sign for these loans. What does it actually mean? |
|
So many bean counters here who are unhappy about other people getting a so-called break while they “did everything right”. Cry me a river. You just want to screw everyone over because you’re bitter?
Maybe they had illnesses, disadvantages, dependents, or other circumstances that got in the way of paying the loans off. Maybe their parents didn’t help them out with cars or bills. Some people may have made out like bandits and others really needed it. Is it really worth all this solipsistic hand-wringing about what you did with your own loans? Can’t you see the broader policy implications of this? |
Yes. People will expect that this gravy train will continue and take out loans they expect other people to repay for them. |