Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

They will just happen in church basements now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the mindset of far right Catholic Taliban institution Georgetown Prep as seen in Kavanaugh and Gorsuch is pervasive across the current student body and teaching staff today. Just a vile institution filled with primarily the silver spooned sons of greedy white supremacists. Same goes with Amy Coney Barrett's Notre Dame.

Wow. Can you be any more hyperbolic?

You have such disdain for people who believe that babies should have a chance at life.

[Anonymous]

How many pro-lifers in this thread and elsewhere adopt or are foster parents? Because as a SW who worked in foster care, I’m going to say not many.
You are hypocrites. All of you. You don’t care about the well-being of children—at least the people you vote into power don’t. You are the antithesis of Christlike.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

ou people don't give a sh!t about children once they're born. You consistently vote against social safety nets. You consistently vote against common sense gun laws. You think the right to own a gun is more important than the right for a 5 year old to live his life without being shot to death. There are 424,000 children in foster care right now in the US. Where are the cons stepping up to adopt them? Nowhere.

THIS!

No. prolife does not equal gun right activism. You’re just dribbling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

ou people don't give a sh!t about children once they're born. You consistently vote against social safety nets. You consistently vote against common sense gun laws. You think the right to own a gun is more important than the right for a 5 year old to live his life without being shot to death. There are 424,000 children in foster care right now in the US. Where are the cons stepping up to adopt them? Nowhere.

THIS!

Sure. How many adopted children does Amy Coney Barrett have? I forgot.......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many pro-lifers in this thread and elsewhere adopt or are foster parents? Because as a SW who worked in foster care, I’m going to say not many.
You are hypocrites. All of you. You don’t care about the well-being of children—at least the people you vote into power don’t. You are the antithesis of Christlike.

Justice Barrett adopted twice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time for 24-7, indefinite, loud protests at the justice's houses. People following them everywhere in public wearing handmaid tale outfits. Public shunning. Not allowed to go anywhere in public in peace.

And then you have the audacity to call them cowards. You think they didn’t know what they were doing? They’d do it again even with your public shaming because it was the RIGHT thing to do.

If they think it was the right thing to do, then they shouldn't mind being dogged in public for the rest of their lives. And their spouses, too. 24/7, indefinitely.

They won’t. It’s still a vile thing to propose.

DP. I am under zero obligation to be polite to someone who wants me to die if I get pregnant again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think anyone who has read Roe, and understands the Constitution, can possibly defend Roe on Constitutional grounds. It simply isn't possible. That's why pro-abortion constituencies need to stop trying to prop up the indefensible and move toward legislative solutions.

How dare you. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's because I spent many years in a progressive EU country where abortion is restricted to the first trimester without much ado or angst, I really can't bring myself to care too much. Most of you live in states where abortion will continue to be legal. It does seem to be the compromise way forward. Red states restrict abortion, making them happy. Blue states keep abortion legal to the last day, making them happy. [/quote

Which "progressive EU country" is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm perfectly willing to return the favor if you want to play this way.

Oh wow another Republican who doesn’t like consequences. I’m caaaaaaaaanceling the lying religious extremists, waaaaaaaaaaah. A “duck your feelings” Republican is having a sad and needs to “return the favor.”

You belong to a minority religious extremist party. I cannot begin to describe to you how little most people think of hypocrites like you guys.

Actually, I support abortion legality in many cases, but people like you certainly make me question that support, and whether I should act on it in any way. Unfortunately left-wing extremists like yourself make reasonable compromise impossible. How about reading your screed and thinking a bit.

Oh, please. No one buys your "actually, I support abortion legality in many case" BS. This is your weak attemp to manipulate people who make you feel uncomfortable.

If you only support abortion if people are nice to justices who oppose it then you don't really support it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many pro-lifers in this thread and elsewhere adopt or are foster parents? Because as a SW who worked in foster care, I’m going to say not many.
You are hypocrites. All of you. You don’t care about the well-being of children—at least the people you vote into power don’t. You are the antithesis of Christlike.

Justice Barrett adopted twice.

And you? I’ll wait…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What year do you think it is?

Just remember his former stance when he gives his speech today that will no doubt be divisive and inflammatory.
At one time, he believed Roe v Wade was wrongly decided.

It is the Supreme Court who is today being divisive and inflammatory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thomas' opinion is really concerning.

SO CONCERNING!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm perfectly willing to return the favor if you want to play this way.

Oh wow another Republican who doesn’t like consequences. I’m caaaaaaaaanceling the lying religious extremists, waaaaaaaaaaah. A “duck your feelings” Republican is having a sad and needs to “return the favor.”

You belong to a minority religious extremist party. I cannot begin to describe to you how little most people think of hypocrites like you guys.

Actually, I support abortion legality in many cases, but people like you certainly make me question that support, and whether I should act on it in any way. Unfortunately left-wing extremists like yourself make reasonable compromise impossible. How about reading your screed and thinking a bit.

Oh, please. No one buys your "actually, I support abortion legality in many case" BS. This is your weak attemp to manipulate people who make you feel uncomfortable.

Whatever, believe what you want. There are cases where abortion must be legal for certain reasons. That's a majority opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm on board with this. DC restaurant owners and stores should refuse service. Kids sports leagues-same. Gyms-same. Hotels, airlines.

Thankfully this would be illegal.

But talk about hypocritical… someone you disagree with? Shame them. Someone you dislike? Shun them! You’re suggesting pasting on Scarlett As