Does Men’s College Soccer Survive the Supreme Court’s Ruling?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am just looking forward to the creative ways schools compensate the HS superstars to get them to come to their schools now, and to get them to stay to not go pro early.

Yep much better to pay them and let their agent negotiate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am just looking forward to the creative ways schools compensate the HS superstars to get them to come to their schools now, and to get them to stay to not go pro early. [/quote

]
When it comes to HS there are no superstars. Superstars play club. Yes many club players also play HS but not the superstars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am just looking forward to the creative ways schools compensate the HS superstars to get them to come to their schools now, and to get them to stay to not go pro early.

When it comes to HS there are no superstars. Superstars play club. Yes many club players also play HS but not the superstars.

No - the superstars are already playing pro, like Paredes and Nyeman.

[Anonymous]

Look the cost of a scholarship is really nothing to Universities and colleges. Do not believe the p&l from these institutions. They inflate cost and hide revenues. They have sports programs because it make business or marketing sense. I remember Duke before basketball success. It was a sleepy southern finishing school.

The places that make money off the money sports will break off from the NCAA(think SEC, etc). Why share or be under their rules?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am just looking forward to the creative ways schools compensate the HS superstars to get them to come to their schools now, and to get them to stay to not go pro early. [/quote

]
When it comes to HS there are no superstars. Superstars play club. Yes many club players also play HS but not the superstars.

I am talking about men’s football and basketball. No one’s paying a soccer player jack to play at their school (outside of scholarships). C’mon keep up there turtle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Look the cost of a scholarship is really nothing to Universities and colleges. Do not believe the p&l from these institutions. They inflate cost and hide revenues. They have sports programs because it make business or marketing sense. I remember Duke before basketball success. It was a sleepy southern finishing school.

The places that make money off the money sports will break off from the NCAA(think SEC, etc). Why share or be under their rules?

Correct. A separate entity that is affiliated with but not part of the university and leases the stadium, shares ticket and t.v. revenue with “the host” etc. it will be for men’s b-ball and football only. Maybe (maybe) they’ll be a requirement by that entity that you must be enrolled in pursuing a degree at the affiliated school. Maybe.

[Anonymous]

MLS Second division will have a bigger affect on college soccer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MLS Second division will have a bigger affect on college soccer

True. Double whammy. Probably all for the best. Kids that are really good (like baseball) should go to the minor leagues.

I think all athletic scholarships should all be eliminated. If the sport earns revenue, then it is a business and if your are on the team you’re an employee and must be paid minimum wage at least. The better you are the more you’ll get paid within budget constraints. The big money sports can pay the big money athletes lots of dough. Soccer, not so much. Colleges can continue to have club teams that are amateur and unaffiliated with NCAA or revenue generation. If you’re good enough or close to go pro, suggest the minor leagues not college. Except b-ball and football where college system is the minor league. Then it’s pay the players as employees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:no one will get paid. This is about image and likeness money.

This case was about additional educational benefits. I’d expect rich programs to drastically increase stipends and paid internships

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look the cost of a scholarship is really nothing to Universities and colleges. Do not believe the p&l from these institutions. They inflate cost and hide revenues. They have sports programs because it make business or marketing sense. I remember Duke before basketball success. It was a sleepy southern finishing school.

The places that make money off the money sports will break off from the NCAA(think SEC, etc). Why share or be under their rules?

Correct. A separate entity that is affiliated with but not part of the university and leases the stadium, shares ticket and t.v. revenue with “the host” etc. it will be for men’s b-ball and football only. Maybe (maybe) they’ll be a requirement by that entity that you must be enrolled in pursuing a degree at the affiliated school. Maybe.

Sounds like a massive risk that they lose the title IX suit and owe enormous damages

[Anonymous]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ncaa-college-sports-name-image-likiness-nebraska-11624499101?st=mbaed9a8zmgg1jk&reflink=article_copyURL_share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look the cost of a scholarship is really nothing to Universities and colleges. Do not believe the p&l from these institutions. They inflate cost and hide revenues. They have sports programs because it make business or marketing sense. I remember Duke before basketball success. It was a sleepy southern finishing school.

The places that make money off the money sports will break off from the NCAA(think SEC, etc). Why share or be under their rules?

Correct. A separate entity that is affiliated with but not part of the university and leases the stadium, shares ticket and t.v. revenue with “the host” etc. it will be for men’s b-ball and football only. Maybe (maybe) they’ll be a requirement by that entity that you must be enrolled in pursuing a degree at the affiliated school. Maybe.

Sounds like a massive risk that they lose the title IX suit and owe enormous damages

No it’s does not.