| This is infuriating! Such a double standard. |
My kids were in private at that age because there were no slots for our family’s income level. Later, one of my kids went to the private school down the street where I taught because before and aftercare were included in the FA package. It cost me less than $400 to cover her from 7 am to 5 pm. If she had gone to our neighborhood public, it was $350 for before care and $350 for aftercare. I saved $300 sending my kid to private! |
|
Lay off, OP. Plenty of public school teachers and teachers’ union people put their kids in private, and that’s fine with me. I’m not a teacher and put my kids in public. All good. |
| He is typical CA liberal. Nothing new. |
way to miss the point. |
Yes. OMG the lack of reading skills (issue clearly laid out in his first post) and lack of reasoning and lack of knowledge of current events. |
This isn’t a teacher |
NP +1 It's par for the course. At this point I'd be shocked if a liberal acted with any integrity. It's no problem if you send your kids to private schools, but you can't do that while you oppose school choice, oppose charter schools or oppose public school openings. |
| Of course he used to teach in DC. Typical. |
Right? Teenage girls get in trouble all the time about shorts lengths, bra straps, width of t shirt bands. But suddenly now we cant do anything about kids' clothing? Spare me. |
Fake news. I have been told all year that teachers barely make a living wage, so they clearly could not afford to send their kids to private schools. |
| This is a toddler going to day care, not school. Very different. |
| Yuck, and his deadlocks. |
Nope |
Why? It's a no win situation. Teachers with small kids at home catch shit from parents. Putting your kid in childcare means you catch shit from parents. A daycare for two year olds can have much smaller ratios and more stringent covid protocols than a public school ever will. |