Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I see Ashburton Elementary's GreatSchools rating is down to a 6. Any idea what has caused the decrease in ranking?
I would also be interested in any current parents' experience with Kindergarten / 1st grade at Ashburton. My kids would start Kindergarten in Fall 2022 and we are already starting to think about whether we will send them there or to a private school in the area.
It’s the new GS equity ratings driving down the score, punishing schools with more diverse (income, English language fluency), hence the sharp drop
over 1-2 years. A few other schools with more diverse swings in income in their student populations have dropped as well (Bradley Hills went down to a 7 for example, Garrett Park is down to a 6). Other nearby schools (with higher GS scores) that they’re being measured against have near totally homogeneous student populations when it comes to family background and income. So they’re essentially rewarded (in scoring) for their lack of income diversity in their student body.
Cry me a river. I can name several very diverse schools in Howard and Anne Arundel Counties that have much much higher equity ratings than Ashburton. Maybe compared to the richer schools nearby (which would probably also have the same ratings if the demographics were flipped) you’re being “punished,” but not compared to Maryland state averages for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, which is who those kids are being measured against in that section. Ashburton got a low equity score because it doesn’t serve its students from disadvantaged backgrounds well compared to the MARYLAND state average, not compared to just the other schools in rich W clusters.
Everyone is always so quick to discredit rating websites that rate schools in W clusters low, but when it’s a school in a non-W cluster, everyone assumes it’s cause those kids are lazy.
I don’t know much about Howard or Anne Arundel County schools since I don’t live anywhere near there, but I’m sure others who follow those forums do. However, since we’re on the MCPS forum: can PP name several very diverse MCPS schools with similar SES demographics to Ashburton (and Bradley Hills and Garrett Park) that currently enjoy sky-high equity ratings on GS?
- Wilson Wilms Elementary in Clarksburg has a 7/10 GS Equity rating with a student body that is 27% Black and Hispanic and 9% FARMs recipients (vs 32%/12% at Ashburton):
https://www.greatschools.org/maryland/clarksburg/5188-Wilson-Wims-Elementary-School/#Equity_overview
- Spark M. Matsunaga Elementary in Germantown has an 8/10 equity rating and 9/10 overall rating with a student body that is 36% Black/Hispanic and 20% FARMs recipients:
https://www.greatschools.org/maryland/germantown/2039-Spark-M.-Matsunaga-Elementary-School/#Race_ethnicity*Test_scores*Math
- Bells Mill Elementary in Rockville has a 10/10 Equity rating with 20% of its students being Black or Hispanic and 10% being FARMs recipients:
https://www.greatschools.org/maryland/rockville/858-Bells-Mill-Elementary-School/
- Westover Elementary in Silver Spring has a 9/10 equity rating with 60% of its students being Black and Hispanic and 27% receiving FARMs:
https://www.greatschools.org/maryland/silver-spring/979-Westover-Elementary-School/#Equity_overview
Oh, and there’s plenty of more. GS is not “punishing” Ashburton for having more ethnic minorities, Ashburton is punishing itself by not serving its students from disadvantaged backgrounds as well. So funny how W school families will accuse the ratings of being racially biased when it’s their school but not when it’s a non-W elementary school with twice the amount of students from disadvantaged backgrounds that somehow manage to shame Ashburton when it comes to equity.
These examples are great. But unfortunately none of the schools listed here, with the possible exception of Bells Mills (and even that’s off), come close to mirroring the community makeup, or demographic or income distribution of Ashburton. However, it is truly encouraging to see that within a mere 45-60 min drive exist schools who have managed to meet GS’ equity criteria. Kudos to them.
It still doesn’t change the fact that GS new equity ratings factors are penalizing *many* schools with diverse SES populations. And they are further boosting scores of schools with demographically homogeneous populations—by rewarding them for “equitably serving” their students who all come from the same levels of advantage. And no personal vendetta against all “W” Cluster will change this fact borne out by the data.