
And you're supporting your statement with ????? Post the stats and then we can "chat." Until then, I'll have to call you a moron. |
And too often, under educated. |
I hope you're not a teacher. The post does not say ALL, it says AVERAGE! So that would imply that there are many genius teachers out there, and many not so bright ones too. |
I have many relatives and friends who are teachers, none of whom graduated in the bottom half of their classes. In fact, they were superior students. They have a love of learning and teaching. Please crawl back under your rock. |
Oh, just stop it. I have a Masters from an Ivy League and I am in the 'profession'. I have a colleague who is a wonderful teacher, super literate and whose emails look like a ransom note. It is more generational and eye-sight/typing related than anything else I can tell. To send a letter 'telling on this teache"r to the principal would be just plain snarky, and not acknowledge the teacher's other great skills (does not generally misspell when instructing, correcting papers, writing on the board...). Again, is this teacher's spelling just the tip of the iceberg of mediocrity, or is this a great teacher who sends unprofessional emails? Like other posters, my fear is if you tattle you will end up with a teacher who just chooses not to email parents at all--not worth the hassle. Just write back with correct spelling and format, and maybe he/she will get a clue. Or gently drop a with-it email style and grammar book anonymously on their desk. Don't be a tell-tale over this though, unless there are a host of other issues. Columbia Univ Teacher's college? |
The Post says "few well educated people enter the profession", a ridiculous statement at best. I hope you are not in a position of any responsibility. |
I posted earlier complaining that I found a good handful of my former colleagues under educated.
I think one serious problem is that people who take BAs in education miss out on a rich liberal arts experience as undergraduates while they study teaching methods. This shouldn't have spelling implications in particular, but it does make for teachers who can offer little depth in the subjects they teach, who rely heavily on answer keys, and who have neither experienced nor read much about the world. Graduate programs designed as initial teacher training are supposed to address this problem. A real head-smacking example I've used in the past on this board is a young former colleague who taught her students (in a geography lesson) that the Yukon is in California, and that the Northern Lights are visible from San Francisco. She argued with me when I pulled her aside privately, saying that the dogsleds in the story she was using to introduce the San Francisco Gold Rush were completely appropriate because it gets really cold around Tahoe "and stuff"... and can't she just continue to teach it like this? Coincidentally, she also couldn't spell, but that's normally more of an idiosyncrasy rather than an indication of inferior education. |
|
Thanks, PP! Your post is definitely appreciated. |
![]() I'm not sure what is funnier - the people who replied that this post contained errors (thereby demonstrating a truly horrifying lack of a sense of humor), or the fact that the would-be grammarians missed a bunch of intentional errors. |
How do you know that the people who replied that the post contained errors weren't playing along, displaiying a post-modeurn sense of irony? ![]() |