Indoor sports

[Anonymous]

Definitely. It's about learning to live with change not stopping everything you enjoy. Not to mention, taking my children out of their sports for a year or more would mean that they can not continue. They will have lost so much skill and development that they are no longer viable for play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

The numbers aren't wrong.

Obviously, riiiighhht. It's someone else's fault because you chose to go out and about as a high risk. Talk about a double speaking hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

The numbers aren't wrong.

Obviously, riiiighhht. It's someone else's fault because you chose to go out and about as a high risk. Talk about a double speaking hypocrite.

Wtf is your problem? Sending our kid to swim practice didn’t seem risky, now it does. Because he got something there—didn’t really think he would given the precautions, but since we aren’t on deck I don’t know if we can trust they are being followed, and per his report they weren’t all the time. So anyway, we pulled him. I managed to catch what he caught because, newsflash, he lives in my house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Swimming yes, indoor soccer no.

this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

The numbers aren't wrong.

Obviously, riiiighhht. It's someone else's fault because you chose to go out and about as a high risk. Talk about a double speaking hypocrite.

Wtf is your problem? Sending our kid to swim practice didn’t seem risky, now it does. Because he got something there—didn’t really think he would given the precautions, but since we aren’t on deck I don’t know if we can trust they are being followed, and per his report they weren’t all the time. So anyway, we pulled him. I managed to catch what he caught because, newsflash, he lives in my house.

there are things that are more contagious, more aerosolized, than sars-cov2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

The numbers aren't wrong.

Obviously, riiiighhht. It's someone else's fault because you chose to go out and about as a high risk. Talk about a double speaking hypocrite.

Wtf is your problem? Sending our kid to swim practice didn’t seem risky, now it does. Because he got something there—didn’t really think he would given the precautions, but since we aren’t on deck I don’t know if we can trust they are being followed, and per his report they weren’t all the time. So anyway, we pulled him. I managed to catch what he caught because, newsflash, he lives in my house.

there are things that are more contagious, more aerosolized, than sars-cov2.

I’m guessing so, and that’s what we got, I’m just not totally comfortable with everything now that cases are going up and I think we need to do more to stop spread. The OP asked, I answered.

[Anonymous]

My daughter has been playing indoor volleyball since June. But now all of her teammates and coaches are dead.

Idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

The numbers aren't wrong.

Obviously, riiiighhht. It's someone else's fault because you chose to go out and about as a high risk. Talk about a double speaking hypocrite.

Wtf is your problem? Sending our kid to swim practice didn’t seem risky, now it does. Because he got something there—didn’t really think he would given the precautions, but since we aren’t on deck I don’t know if we can trust they are being followed, and per his report they weren’t all the time. So anyway, we pulled him. I managed to catch what he caught because, newsflash, he lives in my house.

there are things that are more contagious, more aerosolized, than sars-cov2.

+1. My kid recently picked up a cold at daycare. Once symptoms were obvious we kept him home and our provider has been pretty strict about illnesses in general. But generally once you’re sympathetic you’ve probably already spread to others. Don’t just assume that “people suck.” Because there’s a whole crop of people on here who likely think that YOU suck for letting your kid participate in indoor sports during a pandemic to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Symptomatic, not sympathetic haha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just pulled our kid out of swimming. We were comfortable with it before, not now that we’ve all caught a cold from the kid (not covid thank goodness). That’s the only place he’s been indoors, so obviously not safe enough.

Oh thank goodness you only caught a milder version of cv19. Did you get tested to confirm you weren't cv19 positive or are you just guessing? I assume you don't have a co-morbidity like diabetes or are living with elderly co-morbid people. Otherwise, you are really risking death at .0012% or serious illness at .01% if you caught cv19.

A few things. We got tested. Your numbers are wrong. We don’t want to risk spreading covid to people more vulnerable than we are, though I am personally in a high risk category.

We are also quarantining even with negative tests because we have symptoms, and the tests can be unreliable. Obviously someone can to practice contagious with something, and now we have it. Because people suck.

Eh, swimming with a cold sucks. Yeah, I guess it’s possible the parents knowingly sent their kid to swim practice with a cold, but cold viruses spread pretty easily. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was unknowingly in this case. A bunch of kids hanging out inside unmasked in the water and on a pool deck? Of course something would get passed around eventually.

[Anonymous]

WTF is wrong with you people? No way in hell would I allow my kid to do anything indoors (other than my house), especially not with other kids, indoors for an extended period of time, where they will be sweating/breathing hard/spreading the airborne virus.

[Anonymous]

No. Unfortunately because DC will lose skills. But the ped was really against it because of all of the heavy breathing in close quarters.

[Anonymous]

Mostly no (not full team sports). Not now.

One of my sons has continued his indoor batting lessons but it is just him and an instructor.

I could see doing indoor swim lessons or stroke development etc if distanced.

Basically I think some individual or small group things would be ok with me (depending on circumstance) but not full team sports