| Too much time has been spent on the plans for in person learning. They should have used this time on building a state or national distance learning platform (perhaps through Google Classroom) that every student could have accessed. Then, each state could have put together a childcare program in empty schools. But no, we are still thinking in 2019 mode. |
+1. DL wasn’t a disaster for my kids. It was different from their in-school experience, but it’s not like in-school is a perfect experience either. This has been a great opportunity to work on things that my kids wouldn’t normally get to do in school. |
YES! You said it much more succinctly than me. Google classroom is such a simple, easy, inexpensive solution. Often older government leadership is clueless on how to drive and manage change. Gen X/Millenials and younger tend to adapt/react fairly well, and quickly. They are innovators who often seek and drive social norms and changes at this point. Hell, every time everyone hops on a new platform, the younguns move on to a new one.
|
which school district |
This. |
APS sample schedules mimic in person class, at least for K-5. It's absurd. |
Well, that is a very sensible plan. As a teacher, I'd be behind this idea. However, if a teacher is teaching a small group of students every hour, say -- what are the rest of the kids doing during that time? No one is supervising their instruction since the teacher is working with a small group. In a classroom setting, the teach assigns "seatwork" or "center activity" to keep the kids productively occupied during their non small group instruction. And we have been told that parents want their kids to have a robust day of learning -- basically they open their chromebooks up at 8:15 and they are engaged with work and occupied for at least 3 hours. |
+1 There will have to be asynchronous lessons to deal with equity issues. And attendance will be very lax for the same reason. Many kids won't be able to attend all live classes for a variety of reasons. |