I think there's a lot of fear-based, defensive posturing among teens. This "holier-than-thou embracing my nerd-ness" attitude will likely slough off by freshman spring as he/she has more interactions with real people rather than imagined "losers." Hopefully. |
My friend who went to U of C says she had fun there. It was geeky, nerdy fun, but fun. |
We are talking about teenagers here. Of course they do! |
No, it isn't actually. These are teenagers, and while we may object to the language of the age (the partiers use far worse words to describe the straight laced kids, of course), the important point is that the actual judgement being made is that getting high and partying is not OK, and if they are strong enough in character to avoid the pressure to join in and are turned off by the kids who engage in that behavior, they are not going to have a hard time in college or professional life. They'll be fine. |
| The concept of nerdiness is overblown, IMO. 15 years ago, yes, very nerdy. The school changed in terms of a much more striver, pre-professional, far less intellectual vibe, so now the student base/experience seems to be much more like any other top 20 school. Really quite a loss. |
| There’s that weird “striver” word. Usually accompanies a dumb post. Yep, confirmed. |
| DC parties every night from Wednesday night to Saturday night. |
At least for your post. |
~crickets~ |
| Son in law graduated from there. It is a very miserable, no fun, high pressured place. |
This |
| I went to U of C. That's not true. It's definitely a fun and interesting place, but it's not even close to a party school if that's what you're asking. |
Either this is a meaningless statement (e.g. for every school, there is some kid who will find it perfect) and/or it begs the crucial questions (how many such kids/what profile). Abstractly, my kid (PhD bound, academically well-rounded and there for (rather than despite) the Core, appreciative of the undergrad cohort (smart, serious, friendly, interesting), engaged in a wide range of activities) is the right kid for UofC. But DC would be the first to tell you that the school is not perfect. Lots of undergrads feel really oppressed/pressured/depressed. DC is generally not one of them, but being surrounded by smart/serious/nice/interesting/engaged people who are routinely depressed and/or freaking out (and doing so in an environment where mental health services are relatively scarce and not very good) creates an environment that falls far short of perfection. UChicago can be a soul-crushing experience even for kids who came in as joyful nerds. This is DC’s perspective from the vantage point of 4th year. First year, DC’s reaction was “this is great!” but arguably “this” was college and the city of Chicago rather than the University per se. |
Not a school for everyone. But perfect school for the right kid? It's more difficult to get into than most Ivy colleges. |
so you believe that there are folks who fondly remember that days when Chicago was a member of the Big 10? Hint: the university left the conference in 1946
|