| OP, ask her to come up with 10 choices. Let her research it. She'll learn, you'll learn. Even if you let her do ED, since it's still months away, having her consider others would be wise. I don't think the exact definition of safety/match needs to be determined if, at least, she's trust her own research that some are easier to get into than Northwestern. |
So out-of-state second tier is better than VA second tier? Why? Because they cost more? Because you have to put the kid on a plane to get there? Some people might be impressed by the implied message about wealth that comes when you say your kid goes to an out-of-State school, but it’s bizarre to say those schools are better than the Virginia schools that are similar in selectivity/rank. |
|
OP hasn't answered whether the 3.8 is weighted or unweighted. If it's weighted UVA and W&M are likely both out of reach, even ED (but could try). So I would suggest insisting on an in-state safety--maybe JMU?
|
3.8 is unweighted |
| The top 20-30 schools are crap shoots for nearly every student with stellar stats. Then they have target/safeties in a clump for the rest. There are too many extremely good students and not enough spots at those schools. However, the great thing is- that there are tons of other fabulous schools and your DC can look around and find the schools that they really like and fit. |
| A 3.8 weighted us not high enough to get into W&M unlesss seriously hooked. Check Naviance and SCHEV stAtustics |
The thing is that there are plenty of flagship out of state schools that are ranked HIGHER than the second tier in Virginia. Those are the out of state schools they are sending their children to- not equally ranked out of state second tier schools. |
| 3.8 unweighted could consider Colgate, Wesleyan, Bucknell, Lehigh, Colby, Bates, Middlebury, Tufts, Wash U, Emory. Lots of schools in that range. |
This post is totally off-base for a 3.8 unweighted. Selective schools are definitely within reach. |
Not if they aren’t in an AP program. |
And double the cost. Better to save that money for grad school. |
| These are good stats! No wonder most kids these days have mental health issues. OP, please let your kid apply to whatever college she wants to as they look at the total package and some standardized test scores are not required or optional. |
Yes, ask her her take a look at these (a mix of high matches/low reaches and regular matches/targets). For other mid-sized and small schools that would be target /low target, ask her to take a look at: Case Western (excellent school, but stronger in STEM / health sciences / - is she looking to be a humanities major? their econ department looked good, but I don't know about other humanities there), U. Richmond, Fordham, Davidson, Denison, Kenyon, Macalester, Barnard, Oberlin, Wooster, Skidmore, Grinnell, Bowdoin, Dickinson, Allegheny. She could read about them in the Princeton Guide and see what appeals to her. And I agree that it's worth looking at a couple of the other smaller Virginia schools as safeties (CNU, UMW), unless there's a safety or two out of state she ends up preferring. It's good to have a range of schools that she's applying to. |
| My goodness! OPs question was what makes a good match for a kid with those stats not whatever many questions you all seem to he answering instead. Wash U, Emory, and GT are good answers I’ve seen for lower reaches. Seven sisters and related LACs that aren’t top five but still elite are some other good options. |
| 1480-1550 is the mid SAT range at Wash U. There are lower SAT scores at Stanford. |