This is the PP with the kid who got 35/36. I don't think it affected her CogAT scoring (she got a 91st age percentile, 87th grade percentile). However, she did get offered TPMS admission -- I don't know if the review panel saw or considered this info or not, or whether her admission offer was based on other criteria (PARCC, MAP, grades, cohort, etc.). I also noticed when researching this after I got my kid's score that the offical scoring guide (here, see page 6) discusses a "many items omitted" marker, for when "the student omitted ten or more items but correctly answered 80 percent or more of the items attempted." The guide says that this means "The student apparently adopted an extremely slow but accurate response style. Scores for such students should be considered minimum estimates of their cognitive development." Again, though, I have no idea if the review panel saw or considered this. |
You might not know by then. Last year, we had to submit the course registration to the home middle school, but then it was superseded by the magnet acceptance and registration. |