stupid question about impeachment inquiry depositions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep, you're right, they have gotten quiet.

I heard an interview with Rep Denny Heck the other day. He said that Dems and GOP each get 50% time to ask questions, and that most of the questioning is being done by committee attorneys (although he also said members ask a fair amount of questions too). So these GOP complaints that the process is unfair are just BS.

That is because you do not watch Fox. The rest of the media will not quote what a Republican states. Watch Fox they are not quiet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, you're right, they have gotten quiet.

I heard an interview with Rep Denny Heck the other day. He said that Dems and GOP each get 50% time to ask questions, and that most of the questioning is being done by committee attorneys (although he also said members ask a fair amount of questions too). So these GOP complaints that the process is unfair are just BS.

That is because you do not watch Fox. The rest of the media will not quote what a Republican states. Watch Fox they are not quiet.

Help us out. Point us towards a Republican quoted about this on Fox. Or anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have been quiet because the first witness, Volker, was a structured interview. They have now changed these to "depositions" which means members cannot comment on testimony. The Republicans have been abiding by that. The Democrats have not. Schiff, et al, have been leaking any thing that is helpful to them. They are not sharing soundbites that aren't.

It is that simple.

There is no such prohibition in a deposition. Republicans were very vocal early on and have since seen and heard testimony that is indefensible. They are listening to the evidence of the debasement by this administration of our core principles as Americans.

[Anonymous]

In impeachment update letter to colleagues, Rep. Schiff says he intends to make interview transcripts public once it would no longer impact "investigative equities."

[Anonymous]

Fox's Andrew Napolitano: The White House is wrong to say that inquiry subpoenas are invalid without a vote, because "the Republicans changed the rules when John Boehner was the Speaker ... allowing each individual committee to issue subpoenas without a House-wide vote."
https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1184801592178073601?s=21

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In impeachment update letter to colleagues, Rep. Schiff says he intends to make interview transcripts public once it would no longer impact "investigative equities."

He will, no doubt, find a reason not to.
We all know that Schiff has a propensity for lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In impeachment update letter to colleagues, Rep. Schiff says he intends to make interview transcripts public once it would no longer impact "investigative equities."

He will, no doubt, find a reason not to.
We all know that Schiff has a propensity for lying.

Get off the vodka. Do they have AA in Russia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In impeachment update letter to colleagues, Rep. Schiff says he intends to make interview transcripts public once it would no longer impact "investigative equities."

He will, no doubt, find a reason not to.
We all know that Schiff has a propensity for lying.

Get off the vodka. Do they have AA in Russia?

Old and tired retort, comrade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In impeachment update letter to colleagues, Rep. Schiff says he intends to make interview transcripts public once it would no longer impact "investigative equities."

He will, no doubt, find a reason not to.
We all know that Schiff has a propensity for lying.

Get off the vodka. Do they have AA in Russia?

Old and tired retort, comrade.

Still makes me laugh. And cry.

[Anonymous]

What did I miss yesterday? I wasn't able to follow the news yesterday nor will I today. But I'm curious!

Was there any big news yesterday? What do we expect today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What did I miss yesterday? I wasn't able to follow the news yesterday nor will I today. But I'm curious!

Was there any big news yesterday? What do we expect today?

There was some big news yesterday. Some more big news today.