Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was there never a big announcement that HIV has been essentially cured? With the amount of attention it got in the 80's - mid 90's you would think that these new drugs would be major news. I remember around the mid 2000's wondering what happened to AIDS. I hadn't really heard about it for a few years, and it used to be all you'd ever hear about.
Because it hasn't been cured? We've just figured out how to control the virus to a point with
expensive meds with lots of side effects.
I know a young adult who was HIV exposed in utero, and "converted" (meaning he does not have the virus, not exactly the same as cured, because the early meds prevent the virus from developing in the infant so he technically never had it). He was on HIV meds for 3 months, and still as an adult has medical problems linked to side effects during those 3 months. The meds the control HIV have a long way to go.
I'm stunned all the time by the lack of awareness and education around HIV/AIDS these days. I grew up in the era where discussion of it was EVERYWHERE, all the time. On the news, in school, parents' conversations, everywhere. It was part of sex ed.
They don't teach about it anymore. My younger brother is six years younger than me, which is a decent gap of time, but the difference in our understanding/awareness of HIV/AIDS astounded me. He never learned about it in school, it was never discussed in his social circles, and it's not on the news anymore. And he's gay. Several years back when they had that major AIDS forum in DC I was talking to him about it and he just had no idea what I was talking about or the context. It was shocking and terrifying...for both of us. I was so scared that his lack of understanding would lead him to be careless; he was terrified that he could have this disease that heretofore he was only peripherally aware of. He went out and got tested the next day. (He was negative.)
So why isn't it big news that there's a "cure"? As a PP said it's not a cure, it's successful treatment.
And not to put on my Big Pharma Tinfoil Hat, but the preventive drugs (which are newer than AZT and are taken prophylactically) are made to be VERY (unnecessarily) expensive and insurance companies don't want to pay for them. My brother takes them and it's always an ongoing battle to get his insurance to cover it. It is absurd. And it makes me believe there are cures out there that have been concealed because they would cause the pharmaceutical and hospital industries to lose a ton of money. A cure for back pain?! Then who will shell out for painkillers, spinal fusions, chiropractic visits, orthopedic specialist care, etc etc etc?