Thanks, this is interesting to see. As far as I can tell, it seems that kids in Ward 5, 6, 7, and 8 will need to start using their local schools. It boggles my mind why DCPS/PCS has so many empty seats in these Wards and continues to expand in them. |
This is a worst idea than old hardy. They are not going to build a new school at that location. |
Maybe - but that isn't what the DME is saying. He is arguing for mroe schools sharing space with the buildings that exist. So, for example, a new Washington Latin could move in with an under-enrolled Ward 5, 7 or 8 high school and save both schools overhead costs. |
Well not really. If you remove 270 kids who are not DC residents you would have a lot of capacity. The school is not even viable without taking students from out side the city. So why have it? |
Where are you getting 270? That was not at all what the final audit found. |
And then where would that high school have playing fields? |
"Cost" is a polite way of saying overruns so obscenely high that the only logical conclusions are that there was both corruption/skimming and blatant incompetence involved. |
This |
"If you will it, it is no dream." -Theodore Herzl PS - High school sports are going the way of the do-do bird. I'm fine if a new all-city academic-focused HS is opened on the land, with the condition that the school will field no sports teams. It's about time DCPS opened another HS west of Connecticut Ave and its literally one of two spots where that can happen. |
So long as athletes receive college admissions preferences or preferential consideration for college admissions, sports will not disappear from U.S. high schools. Even BASIS, which famously eschewed sports when it began, has added sports teams for DC students who want them (at this point MS and HS soccer, basketball, track, cross country). As for Ellington, don't they need those fields for PE? They aren't exempt from that graduation requirement. |
|
The stupidest idea I’ve heard in a long time.
There are so many other ideas that make total sense, but because they do, they will not lead to anything like this bizarre plan. |
| There is no arts side and academic side to Ellington in terms of function. It's not as if all the kids are on one side then gravitate to the other side after academics are done. That's ow how it, or any arts school, works. All the space is functioning at all times with kids doing independent projects, teachers doing labs and holding office hours or prepping. Arts teachers come hours earlier to prep for classes, plays, filming, speakers. Meanwhile equally beautiful Dunbar is literally half empty. Why no mentions of that? |
Ellington doesn't have traditional PE on the track/field. Dance and theater students have "movement" and ballet classes. The other students have a PE module for one year (out of four) that is more academic in nature and learning about best practices for physical movement: http://www.ellingtonschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NSuttonMackey-Physical-Education-I-II-Syllabus-SY18-19.pdf They are not using the track and field with any sort of daily regularity. I think the marching band may use it for part of the year, but they mostly march in the streets of Burleith. |
| Might be helpful to know that while the school had little final say in the matter, Ellington's recommendation was to build from ground up at that field. Much cheaper than the reno. It was not approved and was fought mostly by neighbors who wanted green space. Does not bode well for a new school in that location. |
Boy, "green space" is really turning into the all-purpose NIMBY rationale for opposing anything new. |