The Banishment of the Sussexes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

Lol

Or vice versa. The first post in this thread congratulates H&M for doing a great job raising children, while criticizing W&K for not doing that. Somehow.

[Anonymous]

The only reason I care is because the Cambridges seem pissed off at being 'overshadowed'. Well they wouldn't be if they got up and made an effort.

It's sick to bully a pregnant woman (or try to anyway) to cover up your laziness and affairs with your mistress. At least when Charles was attacking Diana, he only did it for the latter reason.

I'm the PP who said they Cambridge fan is a loon. I stand by that. I think they are part of the wider group who also doubt Meghan is pregnant. They seem to talk about "moonbump' a lot.


Here's an article today about them:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-bizarre-cult-of-meghan-markle-pregnancy-truthers?ref=home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

What's your source that they're in school for "most of the day"? I presume that even if they attend 8-2, that leaves plenty of waking hours. What's your source that Louis is with the nanny for most of the day?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

Are you a parent? Just asking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

Are you familiar with preschool? It's not "most of the day".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

Are you familiar with preschool? It's not "most of the day".

Umm, it is 'most' of the day when most parents are working 9-5 jobs and getting home at 6. If their children are getting home at 2 with no responsibilities from Will/Kate as far as making extra housework is done or their job responsibilities are taken care, I'd say they've got it pretty good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

You must not have children. No offense given because it’s a valid choice. Still:
-school holidays and vacations. Weekends. Sick days
-one not in school
-when they do have duties or preparation to attend to
-supplemental and careful education K&W are responsible for: how to reign as monarch. (But also how to not interfere). Dangers of social media (moreso than any other average kid). Morals and ethics that must be drilled in but not forced so hard that they rebel. Balance of humility and pride. Balance of confidence, standing up for yourself and others but not bullying. Love and joy but restraint. History of their family and the world. And the list goes on and on. A lot of these things are what we all feel the weight of as parents. However, they must feel so much more pressure to turn out a good kid. I can give my kids all of these lessons, and if she still someday choose to be a lifelong crack addict, that’s on her. I’ve done my job and it will hurt, but I did my best. They can’t have that lax view. Selection of important experiences and lessons.

So yes, nannies would be very helpful as you sit down and organize that effort. I have three kids, and shock, on my low budget I still hire babysitters and trade play dates so i can get free time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ooh I love that Lainey post.
I always see her at rooting on drama. And she’ll admit it
But her take there is pretty even-handed.

It just goes to say... a lot of what happens with that whole crew is a mystery. And will be. They’re people who have to live and works like kings who have to live and work like people. Their lives are fairly complicated. We can all calm down a little bit.

Some of the speculation is nutty and self-serving, bigoted or mean, ill-spirited. We all need to be nicer. This world is crazy right now.

What the actual hell? What are you saying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't.

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.

Sure. George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough. Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all. Tsk tsk.

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.

No, you're the loon. Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school. It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.

DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices.

They have one nanny for 3 kids. Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day. Kids are a lot of work. Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.

2/3 kids are in school for most of the day. Louis is with the nanny for the rest. They have private chefs, cleaners, drivers, and tutors for the kids. What's this about 'job'?

What's your source that they're in school for "most of the day"? I presume that even if they attend 8-2, that leaves plenty of waking hours. What's your source that Louis is with the nanny for most of the day?

PP is just making stuff up, because she doesn't like Kate and wants to call her lazy.

[Anonymous]

I think Kate is happy to share the spotlight. She seems rather shy and any attention the press gives Meghan is less time Kate has to be in the spotlight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Kate is happy to share the spotlight. She seems rather shy and any attention the press gives Meghan is less time Kate has to be in the spotlight.

I agree and don't think Kate minds Meghan taking the spotlight. I, however, think Will is being grumpy about being overshadowed individually AND as a family unit.

Kate seems easy-going and just wants to get out to her farmhouse. William is an obstinate and lazy b*stard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Kate is happy to share the spotlight. She seems rather shy and any attention the press gives Meghan is less time Kate has to be in the spotlight.

I agree and don't think Kate minds Meghan taking the spotlight. I, however, think Will is being grumpy about being overshadowed individually AND as a family unit.

Kate seems easy-going and just wants to get out to her farmhouse. William is an obstinate and lazy b*stard.

Eh. I just think William wants to get the media off of the Rose stuff (whatever it is, affair or something else). That's why the story about MI5 and 6 came out.

I don't see William as behind the story about Meghan making Kate cry or texting at 5am or her NY baby shower.