Why isn’t booker getting any traction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the Senators run together for me. My preference would be for Not-A-Senator.

Like the mayor from South Bend. He is setting himself up for the future, but he is bright and has a dash of charisma.

Buttigieg could win. Or if he doesn't, much better VP nod for Biden than that layabout dork Beto.

Buttigig can't win. If he weren't gay, he'd be famous for absolutely nothing at all.

??????????

Identity politics is 99.9% of Dem platform.

If you are not gay, or strange somehow, you are f#cked.

That's what we are supposed to believe. But in reality: the front runners are white males. Diversity is just a song and dance.

Well, if you believe your own stupid sh#t, simply vote for the other party.

Stop whining, Just do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where's the Annie Liebowitz - Vanity Fair cover for someone who isn't a straight white male - riding in like the cavalry to rescue us all?

Hahahahahaha.

Do an analysis of the last 52 covers of VN.

I make this prediction: whites and Hispanics and Asian Americans are ALL underrepresented.

Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Or maybe I'll believe that the party is here for women when I actually see it. Not hear it - see it.

What I won't do is go along/get along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where's the Annie Liebowitz - Vanity Fair cover for someone who isn't a straight white male - riding in like the cavalry to rescue us all?

Hahahahahaha.

Do an analysis of the last 52 covers of VN.

I make this prediction: whites and Hispanics and Asian Americans are ALL underrepresented.

Prove me wrong.

I'm not sure I get your point. I'm unaware of any Asian Americans getting fawning and heroic political coverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the Senators run together for me. My preference would be for Not-A-Senator.

Like the mayor from South Bend. He is setting himself up for the future, but he is bright and has a dash of charisma.

Buttigieg could win. Or if he doesn't, much better VP nod for Biden than that layabout dork Beto.

I know it’s childish but I’m skeptical with a guy who’s last name starts with Butt doing damage in the general. Odds of Trump calling him Buttplug “by accident” are 100%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's a show pony. Not a work horse.

True.

[Anonymous]

There is nothing to like or admire about him or any reason to vote for him. I look forward to the day he drops out of the race.

[Anonymous]

Dems need to stop tearing each other apart and band together, otherwise, we'll have four more years of the "Stable Genius" tweeting ad nauseam and this country will be over.

Reference that wing nut Steve King's latest postings re: civil war:

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a26855468/steve-king-civil-war-meme/

[Anonymous]

Dems need to focus on themselves and find a viable candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems need to focus on themselves and find a viable candidate.

To find a viable candidate they need to focus on people beyond themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems need to stop tearing each other apart and band together, otherwise, we'll have four more years of the "Stable Genius" tweeting ad nauseam and this country will be over.

Reference that wing nut Steve King's latest postings re: civil war:

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a26855468/steve-king-civil-war-meme/

Debating the merits of different candidates on a message board is not ‘tearing each other apart’. We will band together after we have gone through he primaries. Most of us will get behind the chosen candidate whether we like him/her or not. Personally, I don’t want any candidate that shades the truth, overly grandstands, or can’t provide a straight answer regarding an issue. I like Buttigieg and Wang; unfortunately, they have almost no chance of winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's a show pony. Not a work horse.

You know nothing about his time as a Mayor.

[Anonymous]

K

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where's the Annie Liebowitz - Vanity Fair cover for someone who isn't a straight white male - riding in like the cavalry to rescue us all?

Hahahahahaha.

Do an analysis of the last 52 covers of VN.

I make this prediction: whites and Hispanics and Asian Americans are ALL underrepresented.

Prove me wrong.

Wait, you think Vanity Fair has black people on the cover every week? What exactly are you getting at?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's a show pony. Not a work horse.

You know nothing about his time as a Mayor.

He challenged the teacher unions, the #1 donors to Dems, so he's doomed.

Anything else to know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:K

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where's the Annie Liebowitz - Vanity Fair cover for someone who isn't a straight white male - riding in like the cavalry to rescue us all?

Hahahahahaha.

Do an analysis of the last 52 covers of VN.

I make this prediction: whites and Hispanics and Asian Americans are ALL underrepresented.

Prove me wrong.

Wait, you think Vanity Fair has black people on the cover every week? What exactly are you getting at?

I don't know, I don't subscribe to VN.

It's just an informed guess.

Shall we see?

I frankly prefer someone else to conduct the analysis, to prevent my own potential bias to prove myself right