Meghan Markle looks like she's having twins

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Yep. For some reason the pp is obsessed with a wedding date baby even that would mean a child or children being born in the 10-month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Which explains why she looks bigger/further along than the skinny women I know IRL who are actually due this spring...and aren't even wearing maternity clothes yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Which explains why she looks bigger/further along than the skinny women I know IRL who are actually due this spring...and aren't even wearing maternity clothes yet.

Except the baby is due in the Spring - so March, April or May. Not winter.

Twins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Which explains why she looks bigger/further along than the skinny women I know IRL who are actually due this spring...and aren't even wearing maternity clothes yet.

Except the baby is due in the Spring - so March, April or May. Not winter.

Twins.

Not twins.

I suspect the baby arrives in February and they say it's early...rather than confirm she was preggers at the wedding.

[Anonymous]

That dress is way too small for her. She’s busting st the seems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Which explains why she looks bigger/further along than the skinny women I know IRL who are actually due this spring...and aren't even wearing maternity clothes yet.

Except the baby is due in the Spring - so March, April or May. Not winter.

Twins.

Not twins.

I suspect the baby arrives in February and they say it's early...rather than confirm she was preggers at the wedding.

Alright PP is a bet. You’ve got 71 days until February 28th. Those babies look comfortably ensconced to me though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s naturally tiny so she’s going to look big.

+1 I'm 37 weeks and someone just asked me if I had 3 months to go -- because I'm tall and heavy. If you're skinny the contrast makes the bump stand out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

I gave birth to one of my DCs in February. Not to be too technical, but you count 40 weeks of gestation from the date of your last period. My last period was in the month of May. They got married in May, right? So she could be on track for a February baby, conceived after the wedding.

Which explains why she looks bigger/further along than the skinny women I know IRL who are actually due this spring...and aren't even wearing maternity clothes yet.

Except the baby is due in the Spring - so March, April or May. Not winter.

Twins.

Not twins.

I suspect the baby arrives in February and they say it's early...rather than confirm she was preggers at the wedding.

Alright PP is a bet. You’ve got 71 days until February 28th. Those babies look comfortably ensconced to me though.

If it isn't February, then it's March. She's too big for April.

[Anonymous]

Beast

[Anonymous]

I had people telling me I was a) having twins and b) about to pop when I was only 28 weeks pregnant with my 1st. I also got told it was a boy fairly regularly. She's a girl.

You have no idea.

[Anonymous]

Her bumb is barely past her chest, that is about what Kate M was at the same time.

[Anonymous]

She's adorable

[Anonymous]

She looks 26-30 weeks pregnant in that floral dress. She has a big, hard belly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's adorable

Harry -- what are you doing on DCUM?