To this poster - can you clarify a bit more? my child was dx with merld at age 3/4 but as he got older, developed more and more problems. He was then dx with ADHD, general LD and now, at age 12, autism and intellectual disability. He's so far behind in reading, math, etc. But reading your post makes me wonder if he just wasn't given the right environment (and also if I'm not too late in helping him) and that once he was "labeled" and went down one tract, he's now set down this path. |
Those issues are separate from MERLD. Many of our kids aren't getting good diagnosis early on because things look so similar at 3-4 and don't tease out till later. Its impossible to say your child was or was not in the right environment but I do think the right school environment is really important and that will be different for each of our kids depending on their needs. We had the opposite experience as you. My child as he got older, the issues and concerns teased out and many resolved itself and he didn't have any of the other concerns people post here such as LD's and ADHD. He did struggle early on with things like handwriting but we really pushed it at home (along with some OT for holding the pencil). He still struggles a bit with language but he's learning to compensate (which we have been told he'd do). To me, if your child is so far behind, I'd worry is he in the right environment and can you supplement with tutoring if he's happy at that school and if not switch him? If it is an intellectual disability, that's an entirely different situation than a MERLD kid and it sounds like your child was misdiagnosed at the start. My child doesn't have LD and has a good IQ and we've been told by several professionals that that makes a difference. My big issue with current schools, especially MCPS, is the curriculum 2.0. I don't even see how kids with LD, especially those who struggle with memorization, reading and writing can be successful given what they teach and how they "teach" it. We pretty much figured out for early on the small class sizes, more attention, traditional teaching with the foundation work - vocabulary, spelling, grammar was very helpful with the language development. Up till recently we have heavily supplemented with workbooks (not enough time this year with activities and homework). But, our approach and our child's needs sound very different from yours. Given your child is older, talk to them about their school experience and see what they think could help. I am a bit bias though and I don't think our publics do a good job at working with special needs. Everyone encouraged us to try it and I wish I had found another private than went public. I'd switch my child but he prefers to stay and I have no good reason to force it as he's doing well academically. We seen so many great kids failing as they aren't getting the support in school/learned from our friends experiences and we are very careful to watch it, supplement and are prepared to pull our child back into private at any signs of concern. |
Guys: why can’t you please strike the constant autism and see a dev ped poster? Do you see that parents who know anything about SN have to get past her posts? Thanks. |
Just ignore. |
I was wondering the same. How did they test the social pragmatics? |
Thank you so much for your well thought out response. I don't want to hijack the OP's post, but did want to say you talking the time to respond had been really helpful. |