When did you see them? If it was years ago, they were the best. They've gotten so busy and taken on other things that they generally aren't the best anymore. Most people I know who have gone the past few years have not been happy. |
+1. Their heyday was several years ago. He rarely sees patients and she's just an SLP. The reports people get back are really slipshod. |
How did you treat it? |
|
Anyone here who can recommend their SLPs for kiddos with these issues?
Thanks!! |
He is good in person but he used another SLP he never worked with before (clinic scheduled it) and she was an absolute dud. He was helpful and great in person but we primarily went for the report. He is very good at testing kids and getting them to respond.. He picked up on things (good things) about my child that we knew and our SLP but no one else knew. They are so stretched with everything they do that they can no longer focus on the individual kids anymore. She could do it if she raised her rates and hired a secretary or help. |
Not that poster but receptive really impacts everything. For us, lots of speech therapy, small private schools early on and time. |
For us, it was the opposite. Play based was a waste of time and academics were the key to success but my child picked up reading early and easily. |
Depends on the child. Children's failed our child. At 2, they said our child was fine and we knew differently. They denied any expressive or receptive issues even though it was very clear. They told us not to bother with speech. Luckily we got a second opinion who had a very different and correct opinion. |