Hollywood hypocrisy, con't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://nypost.com/2018/01/08/the-post-weinstein-golden-globes-was-an-exercise-in-hypocrisy/[url]

NY Post said it well. I am sick of Kimmels and all of them, they need to take a good look at themselves and stop making fun of politicians when they are all the same, that's like Kevin Spacey calling Roman Polanski a pervert.

I don't understand the Kimmel hate. Senator Cassidy came on his show to promote his health care bill and he is the one who said he would not sign any legislation that didn't pass the Jimmy Kimmel test. Politicians dragged him into this. It would be so hypocritical and downright cruel if Kimmel than ignored the direction of the legislation, which would cut health care for millions. To just say, well I'm loaded, so my sick baby will be well taken care of, good luck to all my lower income supporters and fans who made me what I am! Suckas!

Sorry but he was pulled into this mess and he HAS to speak up now. I see this as VERY different than other celebs.

I am previous pp. I used to like Kimmel, certainly better than that drunk Fallon(weird nameplay in today's climate, no?) Yes, that is a joke, I have a sense of humor too. But, when he refused to talk about Harvey and defended the lack of jokes about Harvey(yes, he made a few cracks at him) that made me realize what a hypocrite he is too. Until then, I liked his jokes. There was also that very inappropriate sketch with "touch my crotch," he did a while ago. Plus, I like to connect the dots, he is clearly good friends with Damon and Affleck, at least when it comes to publicity work, and we know who was their best buddy until recently, and they all know what is going on. How do you look at yourself and demonize politicians when you and your buddies are acting the same and you know it? I was always very open about entertainers needing to stay away from telling "regular people" which cause to take, to support clean environment, help with water over there...This just adds up to my distaste of them all. I am more educated than most of Hollywood performers, as are so many citizens. I object to them doing the same thing politicians are doing, and that is taking me for a fool and "educating" me about things. I no longer watch any talk shows, because they are condescending and insulting my intelligence. I am also not really into politics, tools one and all, and I am smart enough to see that I can't change anything. So, apart from venting here, on this anonymous forum once in a while, I really don't care. Yes, I know I come off a bit nuts, but as a woman, and a mother to a daughter, I am appalled at how little we have achieved to further women being treated as equals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

YES THEY F**** WERE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.colorlines.com/articles/tarana-burke-ai-jen-poo-saru-jayaraman-and-other-activists-why-they-appeared-golden-globes

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Wow. Someone’s got issues... simmer down, dolt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

YES THEY F**** WERE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.colorlines.com/articles/tarana-burke-ai-jen-poo-saru-jayaraman-and-other-activists-why-they-appeared-golden-globes

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Wow. Someone’s got issues... simmer down, dolt.

NP. Did this totally go over your head? The PP corrected someone who got it totally wrong by proving - with links - that the people who started #MeToo were invited and honored. The only dolt is the self-proclaimed anti-liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

YES THEY F**** WERE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.colorlines.com/articles/tarana-burke-ai-jen-poo-saru-jayaraman-and-other-activists-why-they-appeared-golden-globes

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Wow. Someone’s got issues... simmer down, dolt.

NP. Did this totally go over your head? The PP corrected someone who got it totally wrong by proving - with links - that the people who started #MeToo were invited and honored. The only dolt is the self-proclaimed anti-liberal.

I'm the person that you defend it thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

... and the founder of the me too movement was there

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Yes, and that's great. But what about Rose McGowan, Asia Argento, etc.? Let's face it. They weren't invited because they had very publicly accused the Grand Wizard of Hollywood - Weinstein - of sexual assault. No way do the lemmings in the room want that kind of embarrassment.

Yeah all of Weinstein's friends still rule Hollywood. It will never change because it is all greed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

I

They could have swapped Kendall Jenner for Rose or Asia if space was that tight...oh wait it wasn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Streep, Michelle Williams, Laura Dern and Emma Watson brought human rights advocate props as they strolled down the red carpet makes the Rose snub even worse. All those "Time is up" girls are pretty crappy for basically tossing Rose aside and creating a new campaign to make her irrelevant.

Wait, so the Hollywood Foreign Press are supposed to invite theme-appropriate guests to their event, but if their guests do, that’s not OK? That makes no sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

If the theme was the “MeToo movement” why did they honor Kirk Douglas? Because, guy’s got skeletons. Unfortunately no one could invite Natalie Wood.
http://gawker.com/5893793/did-robert-downey-jr-really-just-accuse-kirk-douglas-of-a-brutal-rape

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Streep, Michelle Williams, Laura Dern and Emma Watson brought human rights advocate props as they strolled down the red carpet makes the Rose snub even worse. All those "Time is up" girls are pretty crappy for basically tossing Rose aside and creating a new campaign to make her irrelevant.

Those women are worried that Time Is Up for them to be replaced by younger and hotter. Aging Hollywood actresses will NEVER give less than a damn about other women, especially younger competitive women.

[Anonymous]

Asia Argento signed the petition for Roman Polanski's release when he was finally arrested in Europe. I don't want to see her at the Globes either that'd be more even more hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Asia Argento, Rose McGowan, etc. - the women who started the "MeToo" movement - weren't even invited to the Golden Globes. Guess it would have just been too embarrassing to have them around.

Hypocritical Hollywood strikes again.
https://pagesix.com/2018/01/08/weinstein-accusers-claim-they-werent-invited-to-golden-globes/

Yeah, Rose McGowan has been calling EVERYONE out, political sides be damned. Woman has balls.

She's insulted the Hypoqueen/Hollywood royalty - Meryl Streep - very directly. They ain't gonna have that McGowan tart ruining their glittery little 1% party.

She's calling everyone out because she has NOTHING to lose. She's no longer a marketable actress and her limited popularity was just that - limited. She's not a wonderful actress or anything - she was a cute average actress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

... and the founder of the me too movement was there

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Yes, and that's great. But what about Rose McGowan, Asia Argento, etc.? Let's face it. They weren't invited because they had very publicly accused the Grand Wizard of Hollywood - Weinstein - of sexual assault. No way do the lemmings in the room want that kind of embarrassment.

There are so many things to be upset about in this world and this is not one of them. They weren't there because not everyone goes to the Golden Globes. And who really cares this much about the Golden Globes???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I assumed that most invitees were involved with a project that was relevant to the award ceremony. I have no idea whether she was or not, but they can’t invite everyone who has ever been on tv or in a movie, right?

THIS.

It’s a hotel ballroom, people. You can’t invite all of IMDb to the party. Total non-story.

Actually, no. It's not. The entire awards show had a theme - the "MeToo" movement. The very people who started this weren't even invited and honored. Of course you can't invite everyone in Hollywood, but if you're going to make a Very Big Deal out of this, including instructing all the women to wear black for your cause, then the very least you can do is invite the women who started it all.

Liberals are, as usual, the biggest hypocrites in the room.

... and the founder of the me too movement was there

http://people.com/movies/golden-globes-2018-michelle-wlliams-daughter-me-too-tarana-burke/

Yes, and that's great. But what about Rose McGowan, Asia Argento, etc.? Let's face it. They weren't invited because they had very publicly accused the Grand Wizard of Hollywood - Weinstein - of sexual assault. No way do the lemmings in the room want that kind of embarrassment.

Yeah all of Weinstein's friends still rule Hollywood. It will never change because it is all greed.

And the fools keep supporting them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://nypost.com/2018/01/08/the-post-weinstein-golden-globes-was-an-exercise-in-hypocrisy/[url]

NY Post said it well. I am sick of Kimmels and all of them, they need to take a good look at themselves and stop making fun of politicians when they are all the same, that's like Kevin Spacey calling Roman Polanski a pervert.

I don't understand the Kimmel hate. Senator Cassidy came on his show to promote his health care bill and he is the one who said he would not sign any legislation that didn't pass the Jimmy Kimmel test. Politicians dragged him into this. It would be so hypocritical and downright cruel if Kimmel than ignored the direction of the legislation, which would cut health care for millions. To just say, well I'm loaded, so my sick baby will be well taken care of, good luck to all my lower income supporters and fans who made me what I am! Suckas!

Sorry but he was pulled into this mess and he HAS to speak up now. I see this as VERY different than other celebs.

I am previous pp. I used to like Kimmel, certainly better than that drunk Fallon(weird nameplay in today's climate, no?) Yes, that is a joke, I have a sense of humor too. But, when he refused to talk about Harvey and defended the lack of jokes about Harvey(yes, he made a few cracks at him) that made me realize what a hypocrite he is too. Until then, I liked his jokes. There was also that very inappropriate sketch with "touch my crotch," he did a while ago. Plus, I like to connect the dots, he is clearly good friends with Damon and Affleck, at least when it comes to publicity work, and we know who was their best buddy until recently, and they all know what is going on. How do you look at yourself and demonize politicians when you and your buddies are acting the same and you know it? I was always very open about entertainers needing to stay away from telling "regular people" which cause to take, to support clean environment, help with water over there...This just adds up to my distaste of them all. I am more educated than most of Hollywood performers, as are so many citizens. I object to them doing the same thing politicians are doing, and that is taking me for a fool and "educating" me about things. I no longer watch any talk shows, because they are condescending and insulting my intelligence. I am also not really into politics, tools one and all, and I am smart enough to see that I can't change anything. So, apart from venting here, on this anonymous forum once in a while, I really don't care. Yes, I know I come off a bit nuts, but as a woman, and a mother to a daughter, I am appalled at how little we have achieved to further women being treated as equals.

+10000

But so many of these supposedly compassionate, "liberal" men only extend that compassion to other men, and the proof is in the pudding that they really dont give an F about women being victimized. Children missing out on healthcare? Sure, Kimmel can raise a tear and some human empathy for. Women being mass raped? Eh. Shrug. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://nypost.com/2018/01/08/the-post-weinstein-golden-globes-was-an-exercise-in-hypocrisy/[url]

NY Post said it well. I am sick of Kimmels and all of them, they need to take a good look at themselves and stop making fun of politicians when they are all the same, that's like Kevin Spacey calling Roman Polanski a pervert.

I don't understand the Kimmel hate. Senator Cassidy came on his show to promote his health care bill and he is the one who said he would not sign any legislation that didn't pass the Jimmy Kimmel test. Politicians dragged him into this. It would be so hypocritical and downright cruel if Kimmel than ignored the direction of the legislation, which would cut health care for millions. To just say, well I'm loaded, so my sick baby will be well taken care of, good luck to all my lower income supporters and fans who made me what I am! Suckas!

Sorry but he was pulled into this mess and he HAS to speak up now. I see this as VERY different than other celebs.

I am previous pp. I used to like Kimmel, certainly better than that drunk Fallon(weird nameplay in today's climate, no?) Yes, that is a joke, I have a sense of humor too. But, when he refused to talk about Harvey and defended the lack of jokes about Harvey(yes, he made a few cracks at him) that made me realize what a hypocrite he is too. Until then, I liked his jokes. There was also that very inappropriate sketch with "touch my crotch," he did a while ago. Plus, I like to connect the dots, he is clearly good friends with Damon and Affleck, at least when it comes to publicity work, and we know who was their best buddy until recently, and they all know what is going on. How do you look at yourself and demonize politicians when you and your buddies are acting the same and you know it? I was always very open about entertainers needing to stay away from telling "regular people" which cause to take, to support clean environment, help with water over there...This just adds up to my distaste of them all. I am more educated than most of Hollywood performers, as are so many citizens. I object to them doing the same thing politicians are doing, and that is taking me for a fool and "educating" me about things. I no longer watch any talk shows, because they are condescending and insulting my intelligence. I am also not really into politics, tools one and all, and I am smart enough to see that I can't change anything. So, apart from venting here, on this anonymous forum once in a while, I really don't care. Yes, I know I come off a bit nuts, but as a woman, and a mother to a daughter, I am appalled at how little we have achieved to further women being treated as equals.

I agree.