Enough is enough - stop bringing your dogs in grocery stores

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are so many dog haters posting in the pets forum? Are you trolling?


My dog is a member of my family. She goes anywhere your bratty children would be expected to go.

Deal.

Illegal.

No animal being is illegal.

https://doh.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/doh/publication/attachments/subtitle_f%28chapter28-32%29.pdf

"live animals shall not be allowed on the premises of a food establishment"

"Laws" also once said that it was ok to own black people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised at all the posters who are saying it’s illegal as if that really mattered.

When you're the victim, of theft, violence, or dog shit on your property, you will suddenly find that laws matter.

Especially when somebody’s pet bites your child.

But more likely it's the pet that ends up hurt, from children who can't keep their hands to themselves, who step on paws, who poke eyes, pull ears, tug on fur, and hurt animals they have no business touching

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised at all the posters who are saying it’s illegal as if that really mattered.

When you're the victim, of theft, violence, or dog shit on your property, you will suddenly find that laws matter.

funny how liberals want people to follow laws only when it suits them. At least you know where conservatives stand on most things from the get go

Right now, many conservatives seem to be standing with a child molester. I agree that it is good to know this from the get go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My last dog got so elderly and disabled that he couldn't use his back legs and you would not believe how nasty people were when I pushed him in a stroller. I never took him in grocery stores or Panera or any place that served food. People would just see us on the street and make comments.

And why wouldn't they? If you do things out of ordinary, people are going to notice. If you have goid reason for doing what you do, let it be. If not, stop doing whatever is rediculous to get attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are so many dog haters posting in the pets forum? Are you trolling?


My dog is a member of my family. She goes anywhere your bratty children would be expected to go.

Deal.

Illegal.

No animal being is illegal.

Cuckoo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the owner/manager doesn’t object, tough shit.

This is why people hate dog owners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are so many dog haters posting in the pets forum? Are you trolling?


My dog is a member of my family. She goes anywhere your bratty children would be expected to go.

Deal.

I love my dogs but I am a responsible, respectful dog owner. My dog does not go into grocery stores, restaurants, malls, etc. and neither should yours.

DEAL.

+100000, thank you, responsible pet owner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the owner/manager doesn’t object, tough shit.

This is why people hate dog owners.

I'm a PP. Why? They are doing what is allowed. Hate managers instead. Do any of the offended parties in this thread ever complain to managers?

[Anonymous]

I would like to add that service dogs are not required to have tags or vests. You also can't always tell legitimate service dogs from "just" pets. There are many disabilities that aren't outwardly obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to add that service dogs are not required to have tags or vests. You also can't always tell legitimate service dogs from "just" pets. There are many disabilities that aren't outwardly obvious.

Stop. Making. Lame. Excuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to add that service dogs are not required to have tags or vests. You also can't always tell legitimate service dogs from "just" pets. There are many disabilities that aren't outwardly obvious.

Stop. Making. Lame. Excuses.

I'm a different PP, and I don't think this PP is making an excuse. Do you think having disabilities would be a reason for getting "special" treatment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to add that service dogs are not required to have tags or vests. You also can't always tell legitimate service dogs from "just" pets. There are many disabilities that aren't outwardly obvious.

"Emotional comfort dogs" are not service dogs, and people with legitimate medical needs requiring a service animal know to make sure their dogs are properly identified. They are highly trained and extremely well behaved - it's absolutely outwardly obvious.

If you're bringing your dog everywhere as a security blanket, it's time to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised at all the posters who are saying it’s illegal as if that really mattered.

When you're the victim, of theft, violence, or dog shit on your property, you will suddenly find that laws matter.

Especially when somebody’s pet bites your child.

But more likely it's the pet that ends up hurt, from children who can't keep their hands to themselves, who step on paws, who poke eyes, pull ears, tug on fur, and hurt animals they have no business touching

Child hater. Your pet has no business being on school grounds and hurting a child with no reason. Police officer will explain the laws to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My last dog got so elderly and disabled that he couldn't use his back legs and you would not believe how nasty people were when I pushed him in a stroller. I never took him in grocery stores or Panera or any place that served food. People would just see us on the street and make comments.

And why wouldn't they? If you do things out of ordinary, people are going to notice. If you have goid reason for doing what you do, let it be. If not, stop doing whatever is rediculous to get attention.

I don't think that being calling an f'ing psycho crazy dog *** falls in the why wouldn't they catagory. Someone else also said that dog owners like me should be shot with their dogs. It's not necessary to say those things out loud no matter how out of the ordinary it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to add that service dogs are not required to have tags or vests. You also can't always tell legitimate service dogs from "just" pets. There are many disabilities that aren't outwardly obvious.

"Emotional comfort dogs" are not service dogs, and people with legitimate medical needs requiring a service animal know to make sure their dogs are properly identified. They are highly trained and extremely well behaved - it's absolutely outwardly obvious.

If you're bringing your dog everywhere as a security blanket, it's time to stop.

+1 million. Seek therapy