I was reading at 18 months, so I'm not following your logic here. |
| She sounds amazing to me! My kids did nothing along these lines -- I have a 3 year old and a 2 year old. |
And I forgot to add that I'm no genius, lol. |
Really? Because I taught at a "fancy" preschool in NYC for over a decade and this is a normal, bright kid. |
Is it really that exceptional? My now 3 year old was verbally delayed. We had him evaluated by the county at 18 months. As part of the evaluation, they asked him to pick up and give the evaluator 1 play fruit, then 2 play fruits. He did, and no one was that impressed because it should be pretty standard around that age, or so we were told. Babies understand the "more" concept pretty early! I think applying the sequence is more sophisticated. So anyone can recite 1 2 3 4, but when you ask a 2 year old how hold he'll be on his next birthday, and then the next birthday after that, and he answers those questions correctly -- that's a bit more sophisticated. Still doesn't tell you much about overall intelligence though. But of course any individual example isn't illuminating; you have to look at the kid. There's a girl in my son's day care who is clearly off the charts advanced and has been since she was about 12 months old, when the teachers would take turns amusing themselves seeing how much she understood. Like at 12 months she could crawl over and bring back the red sponge versus the blue sponge upon request, or two sponges instead of one. At 12 months that's pretty insane. Now she is 3.5 and sounds like a 6 or 7 year old when she talks, in terms of her vocabulary and sentence structure and topics/depth of conversation. If she doesn't turn out to be gifted, I'll be astonished. |
OP clearly stated she worked in a daycare and not a preschool. She is asking if her charge is exceptionally bright because she has never encountered a child this verbal or bright before. So many bitter and/or obtuse women on this forum. |
| Sounds normal bright with a caregiver who is engaged |
OP is asking if the little girl she cares for is bright or a genius. How could you possibly not follow that? |
| Can't find the article right now, but you would know if she was a true genius. These kids teach themselves to read at 5 months, take physics in kindergarten, etc. No way the child in the OP is a genius. |
|
This might be THE MOST DCUM thread I've ever read. Not indicting you, OP--it's most of the PPs.
"Eh, sounds typical to me." (Not really.) "140 IQ means reading at age 2 and sentences at 12 months." (This is such BS I don't even know where to start.) "I could read at 18 months." (Yes, and my 6-month-old can walk and speak three languages fluently. I'm just an anonymous internet person, so you can't prove he can't!) |
|
Are you kidding me?!
True genius kids do things like teach themselves to read at 5 months and study physics in kindergarten. For example: A 12 year old majoring in Electrical Engineering at UVA: http://uvamagazine.org/articles/ordinary_genius A 10 year old starting college at Randolph Macon: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/daily/sept99/greg7.htm Get a grip OP! |
Agree!! |
+1. Also, although I did pretty well as far as schooling, professional life, etc. I do not consider myself a genius. |
Where is this stat from?? I was reading at age 2 according to my mother, father and doting aunt, yet I do not have a 140 iq! (I am smart but "average smart") |
Sorry, but I'm with PP here. You asked if the kid was bright, not a genius. "If she is bright..." Really? You're a college educated day care teacher who has been teaching for years, and you're asking an online anonymous forum if you're kid is bright. |