Those "tiny LACs" are better than Georgetown for undergrad. See- Forbes. |
Note that Quaker colleges (Upenn, Swarthmore, Haverford, Bryn Mawr, etc) give a nod to grads from Quaker high schools (Sidwell, Friends, Friends School of Baltimore, etc) assuming the student has the other good credentials. The extra nod certainly doesn't hurt. |
Please check your facts before posting. The graduating classes always have at least 100 and class of 2017 has 122. |
I don't know so much about magical but it damn sure gave my DC a top education and definitely will be able to hit the ground running in the fall. It was worth the extra overtime on the job. |
| OP -- most of those rumors are true. This year's Sidwell class is particularly strong, so expect the final results to be even better than in past years. No, it's not just about the college counselor's connections with certain colleges; in fact, the head counselor at Sidwell was new this year. It has more to do with the reputation of the school (and quality of students/legacy status, etc.). |
|
The top schools pull from private high schools at a much higher rate than from public schools. Yale for example published the profile of the class entering in the fall. Over 30% are from private schools, which is far higher than the percentage of kids who attend private overall.
|
|
DC is a wealthy, highly educated area and the elite local independent schools all offer really strong academic programs. The college counselors and teachers don't have any special pull, but they do help students make their best case. Sidwell students don't get an advantage boost because of the Friends origin at Penn, though Friends are advantaged in Sidwell admissions. And all of the Ivy+ (but not all the SLACS) are need blind so being full pay makes no difference.
These students have every advantage in life, so why should it be surprising that they do well in college admissions? Its hard to find a more worldly, well-travelled bunch of high schoolers than at the top local independents. Unlike the public magnets, they are not dominated by children of first generation immigrants, so the students have a lot more social capital to navigate the process and make their cases. They know how to exhibit the intangibles that influence holistic admissions that go beyond test scores and grades. And, legacy is a plus (though most legacy are rejected) and, judging from my DC's friends, maybe half of the class is legacy somewhere. In fact, Sidwell (but none of the others) used to ask where parents went to college in the admissions process. |
Not true that none of the other privates asked where the parents went to college. DC attended Sidwell and another well known area private that DID ask where the parents attended. |
| Simple, these schools breed strong students. |
| Does Sidwell publish matriculations? |
+1 And see just about any published list of college rankings |
gag me with a spoon |
This. I have a friend who's very smart child went to William and Mary after Sidwell. None of the parent are ivy legacy. |
I think, overall, students are average. It's just there are more legacy parents with money in these schools that definitely helps to swing the scale. If you take kids from the TJ, a lot of them get accepted to ivys, but not too many actually going there. |
And for every story like this, there's the unhooked Sidwell grad at Princeton and Yale. |