Williams for undergrad. Harvard for grad school.
Here's why: Your kid liked Williamstown. Huge plus. I went to Williams and loved it. But you're right -- Williamstown is a small (but gorgeous) place. I studied at Oxford through the Williams-Exeter program my junior year. I took the same tutorials that Oxford students did. It was an incredible experience. (Incidentally, one of my close friends got a Rhodes and headed back to a different college after we graduated). And you are getting some scholarship money, to boot. Then Harvard. But before all of this, pat yourself and your kid on the back for having such amazing options. Best of luck. |
Harvard grad here -- House system at Harvard gives similar benefits to residential colleges at Yale, also very active intramurals, club sports. Given what you've said about his econ background & wanting grad level classes, seems to me he is well positioned to take full advantage of the incredible access and opportunities there. I think it can be a challenging environment for students who come in without strong direction and focus, but for your son it sounds like he'd hit the ground running. As someone who also received a lot of financial aid at Harvard, I also agree with the PP who said your son may be more comfortable with the wide range of econ diversity at Harvard (or Yale). All your son's choices are fantastic, but given all you've shared about him, and uncertain choices later for grad school, I think def go with Harvard (or . . . . . . Yale) |
My DH was an economics major at Williams, and went on to grad school for economics at Oxford. He absolutely loved Williams, and would make the same choice again today. He loved the intimate setting, the small class sizes, and the great relationships he developed with his professors. It prepared him well for an exceedingly rigorous experience at Oxford (which he also loved). He has found the Williams alumni network to be strong. DH wasn't from the elite New England prep school set (which sent lots of kids to Williams), but he had no problem fitting in.
Consider Williams very carefully if your DS really is focused on a strong undergraduate teaching experience. He won't get that at Harvard. I don't know enough about Yale to know, one way or the other. Your DS really can't go wrong with his decision. The schools are all so good that he should follow his heart (and it sounds like that will lead him to Yale or Williams). Congratulations to him! |
Yale, no brainer. The name diff b/t H and Y is nominal, at most, and the fact he wants Y or W means he will vastly prefer Y, seriously. New Haven is also nowhere near as bad as this implies and Y has a way better UG campus life.
-- Grad of both (one for LS) |
The fact that this is even a question suggests you shouldn't choose Harvard. |
Can I ask how your child knows he wants to go to Econ graduate school?
Economics grad school is very different from, say, AP Economics --which I assume is what your child has taken-- or intro Econ in a college (which he may have taken) and math would actually be a better undergrad major (or Economics with a heavy emphasis on math). (I went to Econ grad school, if it helps here.) |
I would choose based on overnight visits. At this point the choice should be about things like fit, happiness, weather, location, feel, and social dynamics. These hugely influence the day to day experience. Any of the schools will work academically and this kid is going to be fine anywhere.
I did "pre-frosh" weekend at Harvard and decided to go elsewhere. I realized the social fit wasn't what I wanted out of college. But I couldn't have made that decision without the benefit of the visit. |
+1 -Another Harvard grad |
I'm not going to deny that Harvard has a ton of money to spend, but to look at that stat and assume it means the educational experience is more valuable suggests to me everything that is wrong about economics. |
No, no, no. Please carefully consider the source of that data: http://collegecompletion.chronicle.com/about/ Expenditure categories are slightly different depending on whether the institution is public, private non-profit, or private for-profit. The spending types considered to be educational in nature, either directly or indirectly, are: instruction, student services, academic support, institutional support, operations, and maintenance. Because separate spending figures are not available for only undergraduate students, the measure includes graduate degrees, post-master’s certificates, and all doctorates. Harvard and Yale's spending per degree includes what they spend on grad students as well as undergrads. (Williams to my knowledge has no graduate programs, so their spending is for undergrads only.) And that amount of money includes what schools spend on institutional support, operations, and maintenance. Institutional support includes expenses for day-to-day operational support, including: general administrative services, central executive-level activities concerned with management and long range planning, legal and fiscal operations, space management, employee personnel and records, logistical services such as purchasing and printing, and public relations and development. Also includes information technology expenses related to institutional support activities. If an institution does not separately budget and expense information technology resources, the IT costs associated with student services and operation and maintenance of plant will also be applied to this function. https://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryPopup.aspx?idlink=325 Many of these things have absolutely nothing to do with the undergraduate experience. A lot of this spending is for research functions that most undergrads will never get close to. The spending includes what the schools spend on law students and MBA students and possibly even medical students. (Depends on how the med school is structured within the university.) And note, too, that the operational expenses in, say, Boston, will be higher than those in, say, Williamstown, MA. This statistic just isn't specific enough to tell you much. It is not a measure that you can use to distinguish between these 3 schools. What you can know is that, among the almost 300 colleges included in these data, Yale, Harvard, and Williams are in the top 4% of spending per degree. Whatever they are spending and however they are doing it, it dwarfs what most colleges are spending. Wherever this student goes, he can be assured he is getting a lot for his money. |
I would think that number has much more to do with the number of buildings on campus than anything to do with what he'll experience as an undergrad. My sib went to Yale. My perception is that it's more progressive overall than Williams. The gay community was much larger (obviously more students overall, too) and more vibrant, and the overall feel more politically engaged. |
Op can I ask what your HHI is? Just trying to figure out what to expect in terms of aid from these type of schools. |
I honestly believe all those bashing Harvard have some kind of bizarre grudge, its making my head spin.
I have a very close friend who had the most marvelous time at Harvard, as did her sister. They both got in ED with double legacies and they are both hugely successful in their professional fields. Having said that, your son sounds like he's leaning for Yale, which is where I would have gone, if I hadn't gone to Europe. |
Many years ago, I chose an in-state well-regarded public university because I received a prestigious full ride scholarship over HYP (accepted at all, no financial aid). It would have been a struggle for my parents to send me to HYPS and pay for my siblings as well. I was happy there and went to HYPS for an advanced degree. That said, it is so hard to get into these schools now, and you just can't be sure it will happen again for grad school. And I do think it makes a difference for the rest of your life to have that name recognition behind you. So I would lean towards Yale, given all the other details you mentioned -- name recognition, fantastic school, and an otherwise good fit. |
FWIW there was a recent College Confidential thread about a certain economics class at Harvard that gave some really interesting and different perspectives. |