What is Jill Stein's motivation in leading the effort for a recount?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:tein is being used.

If you look at the history of the liberal left, look at the parallels between days of rage and the riots in the streets you are seeing now. Paid activists, funded by Soros. The goal is to 'bring the war home'. Then it was Vietnam. Now it's Islam and every other 'phobe' liberals accuse others of.

It was the children of the elite left that raised hell then. Those children are now entrenched in the democratic party, and are determined to finish what they started.

Watch the documentary "Days of Rage" and other documentaries about the liberal left and the Weather Underground. It becomes crystal clear.

p

Complete tinfoil territory. Conservatives seem prone to Soros derangement just as much as Clinton derangement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The money is not coming from the people. There have been folks analyzing the consistent flow of cash - especially in the middle of the night - and something is definitely not right here.

Stein has been promised something. If Hillary and team had done this, they know the pushback they would receive. It's being led by them, but they are using Stein as a front man.

If you read what the tech people at U. MI said, they were very detailed about how they 'believe' that Clinton should have gotten 30K more votes, and that Trump won by 27K. How convenient. They then go on to admit that there is no evidence of fraud at all.

This is all completely false. Quit trolling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penance. It's possible that she put Trump in the White House.

no she didn't. stop being a cliton shill.

she didn't get enough votes to flip pa if they all went to her.

Well, she's paying for recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, where the margins of victory are .3%, 1.2%, and .7%

If she wasn't in PA, the margin of victory would be .4%, clearly close enough to ask a recount.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please recount and audit Nevada, New York, California and Colorado. One of them could flip red and I'd bet Hillary loses 2 to 3mm in fraudulent votes.

Trump has the authority to ask for a recount in those states. If he believes there's been voter fraud, or if the Russians have hacked voting machines in those states, he should ask for a recount. Why hasn't he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein came no where near close to costing HRC the election. The honor of losing belongs to HRC alone.


Stein may be using the delusional desperation of HRC supporters to raise money, though!

Yes she did. There are states where Clinton lost by fewer votes than the number of votes that Stein got.

As for her motivation, she claims it isn't on Hillary Clinton's behalf. She cites reports of potential hacking and fraud. She wants to know if our elections can be trusted. We ALL need to know our elections can be trusted.

Absolute BS. There are two states where Stein's vote exceeded Trump's margin over HRC: WI and MI. Even if you assume all Stein voters would've wanted Hilary in those states and so Hilary would've won them, they won't have granted HRC victory! AND in MI undervotes exceeded Stein's vote totals!

Blame for losing belongs to HRC alone: a shitty candidate who ran a spectacularly shitty campaign. Since clinching the Dem nomination, she went to more performances of "Hamilton" than she made visits to WI!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein came no where near close to costing HRC the election. The honor of losing belongs to HRC alone.


Stein may be using the delusional desperation of HRC supporters to raise money, though!

Yes she did. There are states where Clinton lost by fewer votes than the number of votes that Stein got.

As for her motivation, she claims it isn't on Hillary Clinton's behalf. She cites reports of potential hacking and fraud. She wants to know if our elections can be trusted. We ALL need to know our elections can be trusted.

Absolute BS. There are two states where Stein's vote exceeded Trump's margin over HRC: WI and MI. Even if you assume all Stein voters would've wanted Hilary in those states and so Hilary would've won them, they won't have granted HRC victory! AND in MI undervotes exceeded Stein's vote totals!

Blame for losing belongs to HRC alone: a shitty candidate who ran a spectacularly shitty campaign. Since clinching the Dem nomination, she went to more performances of "Hamilton" than she made visits to WI!

And Stein has PA in the recount too. Now why would she do that, pray tell, given turning the vote in those three states gives Clinton the Presidency. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

They see an opportunity to create votes in the first two states, will attempt to do exactly that, then Clinton will be all "Oh, MY, we MUST look at PA now".

Wait for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i will never tire seeing jill stein - she is hot - she must've been ridiculously hot in her 20's and 30's.

I'm glad you admire her, PP, but she's not sleeping with you.

[Anonymous]

It looks like Stein was a stalking horse for the Clinton campaign.

The campaign is joining the recount effort.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/26/politics/clinton-campaign-recount/index.html?sr=twCNN112616clinton-campaign-recount0500PMStoryLink&linkId=31601127

[Anonymous]

She like others kinda like our Country and would like to see it continue to exist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein came no where near close to costing HRC the election. The honor of losing belongs to HRC alone.


Stein may be using the delusional desperation of HRC supporters to raise money, though!

Yes she did. There are states where Clinton lost by fewer votes than the number of votes that Stein got.

As for her motivation, she claims it isn't on Hillary Clinton's behalf. She cites reports of potential hacking and fraud. She wants to know if our elections can be trusted. We ALL need to know our elections can be trusted.

Absolute BS. There are two states where Stein's vote exceeded Trump's margin over HRC: WI and MI. Even if you assume all Stein voters would've wanted Hilary in those states and so Hilary would've won them, they won't have granted HRC victory! AND in MI undervotes exceeded Stein's vote totals!

Blame for losing belongs to HRC alone: a shitty candidate who ran a spectacularly shitty campaign. Since clinching the Dem nomination, she went to more performances of "Hamilton" than she made visits to WI!

And Stein has PA in the recount too. Now why would she do that, pray tell, given turning the vote in those three states gives Clinton the Presidency. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

They see an opportunity to create votes in the first two states, will attempt to do exactly that, then Clinton will be all "Oh, MY, we MUST look at PA now".

Wait for it.

She's going after states where there were specific stories of anomalies and potential rigging. For example, counties where the initial count was in Hillary's favor but the recount somehow miraculously added 1600 Trump votes putting him over the top, while not adding a single Clinton vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein came no where near close to costing HRC the election. The honor of losing belongs to HRC alone.


Stein may be using the delusional desperation of HRC supporters to raise money, though!

Yes she did. There are states where Clinton lost by fewer votes than the number of votes that Stein got.

As for her motivation, she claims it isn't on Hillary Clinton's behalf. She cites reports of potential hacking and fraud. She wants to know if our elections can be trusted. We ALL need to know our elections can be trusted.

Absolute BS. There are two states where Stein's vote exceeded Trump's margin over HRC: WI and MI. Even if you assume all Stein voters would've wanted Hilary in those states and so Hilary would've won them, they won't have granted HRC victory! AND in MI undervotes exceeded Stein's vote totals!

Blame for losing belongs to HRC alone: a shitty candidate who ran a spectacularly shitty campaign. Since clinching the Dem nomination, she went to more performances of "Hamilton" than she made visits to WI!

And Stein has PA in the recount too. Now why would she do that, pray tell, given turning the vote in those three states gives Clinton the Presidency. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

They see an opportunity to create votes in the first two states, will attempt to do exactly that, then Clinton will be all "Oh, MY, we MUST look at PA now".

Wait for it.

She's going after states where there were specific stories of anomalies and potential rigging. For example, counties where the initial count was in Hillary's favor but the recount somehow miraculously added 1600 Trump votes putting him over the top, while not adding a single Clinton vote.

Link please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i will never tire seeing jill stein - she is hot - she must've been ridiculously hot in her 20's and 30's.

I'm glad you admire her, PP, but she's not sleeping with you.

i wish i could forecast if the women i date will age her like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i will never tire seeing jill stein - she is hot - she must've been ridiculously hot in her 20's and 30's.

I'm glad you admire her, PP, but she's not sleeping with you.

i wish i could forecast if the women i date will age her like.

Take it to Creepy Old Man Looking For A Hottie dot com.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i will never tire seeing jill stein - she is hot - she must've been ridiculously hot in her 20's and 30's.

I'm glad you admire her, PP, but she's not sleeping with you.

i wish i could forecast if the women i date will age her like.

Look at the mothers of the women you date; that will be a reasonably accurate forecast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:tein is being used.

If you look at the history of the liberal left, look at the parallels between days of rage and the riots in the streets you are seeing now. Paid activists, funded by Soros. The goal is to 'bring the war home'. Then it was Vietnam. Now it's Islam and every other 'phobe' liberals accuse others of.

It was the children of the elite left that raised hell then. Those children are now entrenched in the democratic party, and are determined to finish what they started.

Watch the documentary "Days of Rage" and other documentaries about the liberal left and the Weather Underground. It becomes crystal clear.

p

Complete tinfoil territory. Conservatives seem prone to Soros derangement just as much as Clinton derangement

No more Soros derangement than the left has with Koch brothers.