Donald Trump is obese at almost 270 pounds!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at this gazelle!





*body shaming him because it is considered very much acceptable to him and his supporters

I don't get it, are you posters here angry because you have the same body type he does? Are you all figure that he doesn't have Kankels? Are you angry that he looks better than your husband? Let's be honest but you're married fat husbands.

What is Kankels? Sounds ominous.

Are you using Google translate from Russian?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at this gazelle!





*body shaming him because it is considered very much acceptable to him and his supporters

Your comment drips of this misandry and fat shaming.

I thought it's ok to not be politically correct. I mean, you guys go on and on about Hillary's weight and cankles. Fair is fair.

So you're not for political correctness, and you're OK with insulting people that you don't agree with. Now I see it. You're all just figure angry hags

What is figure angry hags? So MANY questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are the relevant numbers for Hillary?

Much too high for her to share.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is much more healthy, plus she doesn't have cankles

Trump is a she? We need an independent exam to confirm that.

That would explain the micropenis!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

Yes it is.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128091740.htm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

Yes it is.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128091740.htm

Try again

http://www.ccjm.org/index.php?id=107937&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=369249&cHash=b708749bb14a6d1c0b32b1bc9864169f


In older patients, the waist circumference may be more appropriate than the body mass index as a measure of adiposity.
Data suggest that being moderately overweight may offer a survival advantage in older people, but a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher continues to be associated with many health risks in this age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

Yes it is.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128091740.htm

Try again

http://www.ccjm.org/index.php?id=107937&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=369249&cHash=b708749bb14a6d1c0b32b1bc9864169f


In older patients, the waist circumference may be more appropriate than the body mass index as a measure of adiposity.
Data suggest that being moderately overweight may offer a survival advantage in older people, but a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher continues to be associated with many health risks in this age group.

Link http://www.ccjm.org/view-pdf.html?file=uploads/media/media_813fe51_51

[Anonymous]

I mean he's definitely a little pudgey but obese? Come on. He looks normal to me. I'm skeptical of the criteria used.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

Yes it is.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128091740.htm

Try again

http://www.ccjm.org/index.php?id=107937&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=369249&cHash=b708749bb14a6d1c0b32b1bc9864169f


In older patients, the waist circumference may be more appropriate than the body mass index as a measure of adiposity.
Data suggest that being moderately overweight may offer a survival advantage in older people, but a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher continues to be associated with many health risks in this age group.

Her waist is obviously bigger than the dreaded 33-35" for a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:267 pounds?!? That's a BMI of 33.4 ... "obese"


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/09/14/donald-trump-mehmet-oz-hillary-clinton-medical-records/90348722/

To be fair, some remembered 267 and others remembered 230. At his age, being overweight is is healthier than normal weight.

thats not true.

Yes it is.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128091740.htm

Try again

http://www.ccjm.org/index.php?id=107937&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=369249&cHash=b708749bb14a6d1c0b32b1bc9864169f


In older patients, the waist circumference may be more appropriate than the body mass index as a measure of adiposity.
Data suggest that being moderately overweight may offer a survival advantage in older people, but a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher continues to be associated with many health risks in this age group.

Her waist is obviously bigger than the dreaded 33-35" for a woman.

Unless you personally measured it, shut up. You look dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean he's definitely a little pudgey but obese? Come on. He looks normal to me. I'm skeptical of the criteria used.

+1 He looks a bit chunky but fine for his age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More to the point, it's not sure if he's listed at 267 or 230z. At 6 foot 3, that's not bad.

I'm 6'3" 230 and I've stood next to Trump before. There is NO WAY Donald Trump is only 230. He's easily 30-40 pounds heavier than I am. If he claims he's 230, he's lying.

Actually, it IS possible, if he's mostly flab; muscle is denser. So, Trump could have a waist size 8 inches larger than yours, but not weight 40 lbs more. He looks at least 250 to me though, and I weigh people every week

[Anonymous]

Where Hillary's fat swimsuit pose with Bill?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where Hillary's fat swimsuit pose with Bill?

Lame. And desperate.