Agree. $180k is a staff CLINICIAN salary. Staff SCIENTIST salaries for PhDs will be more like 90-140k typically, especially to start. |
|
A scientist FOR THE GOVT is not making anywhere close to $200k, let alone $150-180k unless they are in super senior positions.
For a scientist, $150k+ would be manager/senior scientist/principal scientist salary IN INDUSTRY. No, newbie staff scientist in the govt can probably expect $80-120k. Many places in industry pay less than $100k for new PhD scientists. Scientists don't make that much money.....this shouldn't be shocking. |
|
NIH is hell. It’s full of sexual harassment, lazy government workers, etc. |
| I am a scientist for DoD and at Gs-15 pay scale. It is doable. |
|
A couple things - OP's DH is a MD/PhD and so should make more than the average staff scientist PhD. Also, this is a contractor position where salary can be higher than the federal standard.
Personally, I would say a MD/PhD staff scientist with 5 years experience should negotiate for at least $130k from a contractor company, but I know a lot of people will think that's high. |
There is a separate system. FDA MD here. Many of us make > 200k. |
|
NIH is a great place to work.
Watch out - the Heritage / White Coat Watch billionaire-funded rightwing efforts are trying to bring NIH down. It’s practically the one remaining American institution that keeps the US biotech economy at the top of the world. |
|
Didn't read the thread but find a similar person's name and enter it here:
https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/ I was an early staff scientist via contract for the NIH about 20 yrs ago and I was paid on par with those who were federal staff. However, I had to make sure the contract described what I did accuratly. Also, The contractor company was paid about double what I made which led to some resentment. Apparently some staff I made double. No, NIH paid double but I was paid what they were paid with much worse benifits. |
Watch vacation time at NIH. I think it starts very minimal. |