Does Not Voting Send a Worthwhile Message
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Unaffiliated - We are the strong; we are the 40%! |
Anonymous
Then so be it, I say! If people don't have the balls to stand up to these bullies, they deserve what they get. If more people voted third party, there would be a shake up for sure. But most people are weak to take a stand and too lazy to really examine not only platforms but PERSONALITIES. |
Anonymous
My 80 yo mom is writing him in! |
Anonymous
Except that the Republican Party didn't put Trump there. |
Anonymous
Most states don't allow write-in votes unless the candidate registers for the General. |
Anonymous
She's 80. lifelong Dem who's disgusted She'll write in his name no matter what just to make a statement. But yes, you're right. Bernie would need to register. |
Anonymous
| No matter what, please go and vote. Even if your candidate didn't make a cut, you have some time to figure out. My fear is if Bernie supporters refuse to vote, this election will be stolen. There are too much corruption in this government, so, please, for the sake of democracy, go and cast your vote. |
Anonymous
why the hell would well-heeled moms have reservist kids? were they 'reservists' in the sense that it was a resume line for future job opportunities in the public sector? |
Anonymous
| vote third party instead of not voting |
Anonymous
| If you're leaning toward Trump, not voting would be the better option; otherwise, you should vote. |
Anonymous
That would accomplish nothing. The 3rd parties have failed to build sustainable grassroots organizations and in their current form are simply agents of chaos. |
Anonymous
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Good one. |
Anonymous
|
I am SO tired of this childishness.
Elections aren't about finding that very special candidate you love from the bottom of your soul. Elections are about being involved in the civic process and choosing a candidate from the ballot that you feel can represent our nation's interest best in the coming term. Neither candidate is "evil" this election. The problem is that most Americans, like you, use this awful metric of how they FEEL to choose a candidate. That's garbage. There's a reason it's not legal to hire someone unqualified based on how you feel about them -- you should be evaluating all candidates (major and minor parties) and choosing the one you think is best for the job. Guess what? If you've ever hired someone, you have had to make a similar decision -- you can't hire someone who isn't in your applicant pool (Kasich) so you need to pick someone who is actually a candidate for the job. Not voting is a protest or apathy. So are you protesting or apathetic? Because if it's the former, then next time donate to your candidate, get involved earlier in the process, get your boots on the ground and make sure the candidate you think is best for the office makes it through the primaries. If it's the latter, you are a waste of space in a country where people have died for the right to vote. |
Anonymous
+1 Rich republicans don't have kids in the service. Rich democrats do. Poor republicans do, poor democrats do. Rich republicans are about as patriotic as Putin. Which is to say -- they pretend to be when it suits their Machiavellian interests. |
Anonymous
| Not voting sends this message: I let other people choose for me. |