PP again, I really think this practice only serves to attract only desperate candidates. Otherwise, who would open themselves up this way if they already have a decent job? If they don't get the new job they may also be pushed out of their existing job of at least marginalized. |
| If it's being done before you've even interviewed in person with a decision maker, someone's wanting contacts./ |
|
My insurance provider has instructed my business to only give "neutral" information about an employee (when they started, their job title, etc.). I am not allowed to say anything negative about anyone because that may get the business sued for defamation if that negative reference prevents the ex-employee from getting a job. This includes people who were let go because they stole from the company, faked an illness to get disability/paid leave/insurance, threatened physical harm to other employees, stopped coming to work for extended periods, spent all day gambling and not working, etc.
http://employment.findlaw.com/hiring-process/is-a-former-employer-s-bad-reference-illegal-.html I am not really supposed to say anything nice either (since the inference is that an employee must be shady if I don't say something nice). |
|
I would opt out of any hiring process that wanted to talk to my current boss before making an offer that I have accepted. Insistence on jeopardizing my job before making me an offer and negotiating salary means I don't want to work for you. I work in the private sector though so maybe things are different for Feds.
When I was a hiring manager I was not allowed to provide ANY references. Employment is confirmed though some automated solution, not taking to anyone. Again, private sector. |
+1 I couldn't agree more. Seems like it would only be the first of many unreasonable requests and expectations. |