Janet Jackson - expecting!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh more power to her. I had a baby at 39 and it wore so much more on my body than when I had a baby at 30.

She should have just paid somebody to carry that baby(ies).

I was thinking the same thing! If I had that kind money I would have all my resources find me the perfect uterus and pay them an ungodly amount of money. Jimmy Kimmel style.

Fallon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL.

Doubt she can even have kids. No one wants to see her in concert.

Except those shows were sold out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^^^
Could the 'sales' be the resellers buying tickets? And those resellers possibly haven't sold their tickets yet?

NP Could the sales be people like me who wouldn't even know how resale works ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh more power to her. I had a baby at 39 and it wore so much more on my body than when I had a baby at 30.

She should have just paid somebody to carry that baby(ies).

I was thinking the same thing! If I had that kind money I would have all my resources find me the perfect uterus and pay them an ungodly amount of money. Jimmy Kimmel style.

she did - she has a surrogate. She picked London because it was colder and the fake bump was less noticeable and more comfortable.

It looks like she's gained all over, not just her belly. If she was just running around with a perfectly round little belly I would be suspicious. But she looks like she is pregnant all over.

Blind Gossip confirms the surrogate and a weight gain.

and you believe Gossip over what is evidently there to be seen by any normal, objective human being. Look at the photos. Blind Gossip is known to make up stuff for the clicks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL.

Doubt she can even have kids. No one wants to see her in concert.

Except those shows were sold out

My sister and her friends had tickets for her show. It was planned as a girl's night out.

[Anonymous]

She still looks great! I would never guess her as pushing 50.

I'm happy for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL.

Doubt she can even have kids. No one wants to see her in concert.

Except those shows were sold out

My sister and her friends had tickets for her show. It was planned as a girl's night out.

NP, I know more than one person who had tickets to her show. My one friend was so mad that she cancelled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh more power to her. I had a baby at 39 and it wore so much more on my body than when I had a baby at 30.

She should have just paid somebody to carry that baby(ies).

I was thinking the same thing! If I had that kind money I would have all my resources find me the perfect uterus and pay them an ungodly amount of money. Jimmy Kimmel style.

she did - she has a surrogate. She picked London because it was colder and the fake bump was less noticeable and more comfortable.

It looks like she's gained all over, not just her belly. If she was just running around with a perfectly round little belly I would be suspicious. But she looks like she is pregnant all over.

Blind Gossip confirms the surrogate and a weight gain.

People believe Blind Gossip over there own eyeballs???

[Anonymous]

She looks overweight again but not pregnant.

[Anonymous]

Janet, like kelly clarkson, struggles with her weight on a regular basis.

And definitely both get "all over pregnant"

[Anonymous]

I think she looks great, especially for 50.

But Janet, like most people who do the "low carb" thing, is a constant yo-yo-er. It works for the short term... but it's not sustainable for most people, and they nearly always end up gaining the weight back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh more power to her. I had a baby at 39 and it wore so much more on my body than when I had a baby at 30.

She should have just paid somebody to carry that baby(ies).

I was thinking the same thing! If I had that kind money I would have all my resources find me the perfect uterus and pay them an ungodly amount of money. Jimmy Kimmel style.

she did - she has a surrogate. She picked London because it was colder and the fake bump was less noticeable and more comfortable.

It looks like she's gained all over, not just her belly. If she was just running around with a perfectly round little belly I would be suspicious. But she looks like she is pregnant all over.

Blind Gossip confirms the surrogate and a weight gain.

and you believe Gossip over what is evidently there to be seen by any normal, objective human being. Look at the photos. Blind Gossip is known to make up stuff for the clicks.

I see a woman who gained weight since the last time I saw photos of her, and anything could be under her jacket. You probably believe Beyonce was really pregnant too, with her folding foam belly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is huge.

And you my dear are an ass.

It's the truth. She is over two hundred.

[Anonymous]

It's true!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/music/janet-jackson-pregnant-first-child-135400241.html?client=safari

[Anonymous]

Of course it's true. She looks amazing!

http://celebritybabies.people.com/2016/10/12/janet-jackson-baby-bump-photo-pregnancy-announcement/