What happened to Chelsea Clinton?

[Anonymous]

I don't think the face powder she's using does her any favors.

[Anonymous]

Looks like she didn't have makeup on. We're so used to seeing celebs with a full face of makeup that when they don't have it on they looks weird. Really, she looks like a normal person.

[Anonymous]

Well I'm glad I'm not aging like that. I'm 43 and would get some Botox if I had her income.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ok I'm just gonna say it...shes always been super ugly. Her parents aren't lookers and she kinda got the worst of both of them.

I think she had a good run in her 20s. She grew out of the awkward teen stage and looked quite lovely.

+1 I agree and have always thought she has a pretty figure and coloring. Although not really a Clinton supporter politically, I give them credit for raising a truly lovely daughter. It's absurdly mean-spirited that people would take the time to criticize her appearance.

[Anonymous]

Not much going on in your life right now, OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A little tooth whitening would go a long way.

You cannot whiten your teeth while pregnant. I stopped whitening while TTC and for a time when I was off the pill, just in case.

A lot of women develop acne while pregnant either because it's not longer safe to use their acne medication, the pill was their acne medication, or the pregnancy hormones are causing the acne.

My face was puffy/bloated the entire time I was pregnant and it got worse and worse over the nine months.

I had terrible morning sickness and I don't think I left the house looking as pulled together as Chelsea Clinton even once while I was expecting.

I'm sure my co-workers were wondering wtf had happened to me.

Thank god no one was taking random pics of me.

[Anonymous]

Anytime someone posts a nastygram celebrity photo here, I wonder if they're going to post candid, unretouched pix of themselves for appraisal. And I wonder why they don't have better ways to occupy their time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone posts a nastygram celebrity photo here, I wonder if they're going to post candid, unretouched pix of themselves for appraisal. And I wonder why they don't have better ways to occupy their time.

I have never understood the sensitivity that some have when it comes to celebrities being faulted.

Most celebrities seek publicity and when one does that you get positives as well as negatives that are emphasized. It goes with the territory. Chelsea had a gig at NBC that paid her $600K annually although she had little or no experience in journalism. Good for her that she got it ........ but then when one faults her for her looks or some other aspects of her life that is also part of what she gets by virtue of her "celebrity".

[Anonymous]

She's always been that hideous. She's always been a hideous human being, inside and out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's always been that hideous. She's always been a hideous human being, inside and out

Are you talking about Chelsea or Hillary?

Chelsea is not attractive but she is certainly not hideous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's always been that hideous. She's always been a hideous human being, inside and out

Are you talking about Chelsea or Hillary?

Chelsea is not attractive but she is certainly not hideous.

http://celebritysurgerynews.com/chelsea-clinton-plastic-surgery/

[Anonymous]

I would rather be smart than have a good make up artist.

[Anonymous]

She favors mom?

[Anonymous]

Who does the care of her child?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone posts a nastygram celebrity photo here, I wonder if they're going to post candid, unretouched pix of themselves for appraisal. And I wonder why they don't have better ways to occupy their time.

I have never understood the sensitivity that some have when it comes to celebrities being faulted.

Most celebrities seek publicity and when one does that you get positives as well as negatives that are emphasized. It goes with the territory. Chelsea had a gig at NBC that paid her $600K annually although she had little or no experience in journalism. Good for her that she got it ........ but then when one faults her for her looks or some other aspects of her life that is also part of what she gets by virtue of her "celebrity".

I just don't understand the criticism in general, or even the interest in celebrities, TBH. Don't people have anything better to do with their time?