Paris and Nicky Hilton

[Anonymous]

I don't see anything ugly about either of them.

I mean...if I saw them at the supermarket I would think they were pretty people.

People like to pick apart celebrities who are beautiful just because. While beauty IS in the eye of the beholder, there are certain people that truly have the birthright of authentic beauty.

I think the Hilton Sisters have it. People can make fun of Paris's "fishhook" nose and huge feet, but she is a lot prettier than your average 35 yr. old.

Look at how beautiful their mother Kathy is.

People also like to pick apart Kim Kardashian, they say her body is weird, but she also possesses authentic beauty.

Megan Fox is so hot that TMZ was sure she had to have some imperfection. So they figured out that her thumbs were too short.

I think people just say they don't think the Hiltons or the Kardashians are attractive because they are not well-liked in pop culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Neither naturally pretty...both work very hard to look good, but to their credit, they are eye catching. Natural beauty though? Neither one.

I don't know... remember when Paris went to prison and they showed her getting out? She had on no makeup and was so pretty. Much prettier than her usual made-up self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nicky is stunning

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

With their big long noses, orange skin, bad extensions and gristly angular bodies neither of them are my bag. Having said that I think they do the most with what they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicky looks pathetic parading around in a white large wedding dress for her second marriage.

It's her first marriage as the other one was annulled.

Are the Hiltons Catholic?

If so, premarital sex is still a no no.

Seriously? Do you know any Catholics who don't engage in premarital sex? I'm Catholic, went to Catholic school, know tons of Catholics and offhand can't think of a single virgin bride.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicky looks pathetic parading around in a white large wedding dress for her second marriage.

It's her first marriage as the other one was annulled.

Are the Hiltons Catholic?

If so, premarital sex is still a no no.

Whats your point?
Its still her first marriage and she is stunning.

[Anonymous]

Paris is actually very nice looking, just a moron in personality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicky looks pathetic parading around in a white large wedding dress for her second marriage.

It's her first marriage as the other one was annulled.

Are the Hiltons Catholic?

If so, premarital sex is still a no no.

Seriously? Do you know any Catholics who don't engage in premarital sex? I'm Catholic, went to Catholic school, know tons of Catholics and offhand can't think of a single virgin bride.

uh yeah

joking about the annulment . . .

I did know ONE single virgin bride, btw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicky looks pathetic parading around in a white large wedding dress for her second marriage.

It's her first marriage as the other one was annulled.

Are the Hiltons Catholic?

If so, premarital sex is still a no no.

Whats your point?
Its still her first marriage and she is stunning.

so many idiots on this thread!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Nicky is prettier and I thought a bit more classy/less about the lime light -- until I saw this derriere dress (scroll down):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3155466/Squillionaires-sex-tapes-marriage-two-unlikely-dynasties-s-derriere-flashing-sister-Paris-Hilton-s-Rothschild-moneybags-tragic-past-Today-ll-wed-Diana-s-old-palace.html

OMG.

By the way, I thought her wedding dress was hideous. I love a sleeved dress, but that was awful.

I hated it, too. However, I was taken aback by how conservative it was - despite the Marilyn Monroe scene.

It's only because of where she had the ceremony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see anything ugly about either of them.

I mean...if I saw them at the supermarket I would think they were pretty people.

People like to pick apart celebrities who are beautiful just because. While beauty IS in the eye of the beholder, there are certain people that truly have the birthright of authentic beauty.

I think the Hilton Sisters have it. People can make fun of Paris's "fishhook" nose and huge feet, but she is a lot prettier than your average 35 yr. old.

Look at how beautiful their mother Kathy is.

People also like to pick apart Kim Kardashian, they say her body is weird, but she also possesses authentic beauty.

Megan Fox is so hot that TMZ was sure she had to have some imperfection. So they figured out that her thumbs were too short.

I think people just say they don't think the Hiltons or the Kardashians are attractive because they are not well-liked in pop culture.

I think part of the problem with both the Hiltons and the Kardashians is they are so over the top. Everything, particularly with the Kardashians, is accentuated to the extreme. It's as though they are cartoon characters. Paris is always "posing" Nicky looks smug all the time. It's hard not be turned off by personalities (at least the ones that the general public are familiar with). They are all better looking than a large majority of the population but I can understand why they are not everyone's cup of tea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see anything ugly about either of them.

I mean...if I saw them at the supermarket I would think they were pretty people.

People like to pick apart celebrities who are beautiful just because. While beauty IS in the eye of the beholder, there are certain people that truly have the birthright of authentic beauty.

I think the Hilton Sisters have it. People can make fun of Paris's "fishhook" nose and huge feet, but she is a lot prettier than your average 35 yr. old.

Look at how beautiful their mother Kathy is.

People also like to pick apart Kim Kardashian, they say her body is weird, but she also possesses authentic beauty.

Megan Fox is so hot that TMZ was sure she had to have some imperfection. So they figured out that her thumbs were too short.

I think people just say they don't think the Hiltons or the Kardashians are attractive because they are not well-liked in pop culture.

I think part of the problem with both the Hiltons and the Kardashians is they are so over the top. Everything, particularly with the Kardashians, is accentuated to the extreme. It's as though they are cartoon characters. Paris is always "posing" Nicky looks smug all the time. It's hard not be turned off by personalities (at least the ones that the general public are familiar with). They are all better looking than a large majority of the population but I can understand why they are not everyone's cup of tea.

The problem is they have zero skills.

Both families got launched because of a daughter's sex tape.

They are classless and repulsive.

They honor the things that most people would not. They think trampy, rude behavior and revealing clothes are to be celebrated.

My parents would not have tolerated manners, entitlement or behavior like these kids.

Look at Ivanka Trump--raised much better.

[Anonymous]

Paris has always been at best cute. I've thought Nicky was always more attractive - a bit stunning. Paris has odd features. Not knocking her, she's not unattractive but certainly wouldn't stand out in running shorts and a top at a Starbucks in DC.