??? Don't think this is necessarily true. |
| There is a wide range in the state schools. VCU is definitely a cool place for free spirits. Another option may be UMW. It attracts a crunchy crowd too. You will find a wide range at all of these schools due to their large size. |
|
NP here. OP, the comments on this thread are consistent with our observations, at least. The VA publics are profoundly different from each other, except for overall institutional quality -- several are excellent, and others are very good and recognized. W&M is viewed by some as the most academically serious for an undergraduate, although UVA is certainly much more of a research university. Do not discount VCU, which is urbane, interesting, and benefits from increasing recognition in essentially every field.
|
I went to UMW and there was definitely a mix of the crunchy and the conservative. It's a small school, but another place where you can find like-minded people and a good mix of "types". |
Too weird, bro. |
Not necessarily the case anymore. All are overpaid, though, compared to, say, 20 years ago. |
Yes, it's true. I just read an article on it last week. This isn't the article, but just good "private university salaries pubic university salaries". http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/faculty-pay-survey_n_3038924.html |
| Those full professor salaries are plenty high for those who get summers off (if they choose) and, in the case of the humanities, don't have any real skill sets that could translate to good earning non academic careers. |
Unless they are adjunct, which many of the them are. |
I went to JMU and had friends attend other state schools, and this is all true. VCU also graduates great teachers. I also had the sense that fraternities/sororities are a lot more important at UVA than at JMU or other state schools. Also, at the time William and Mary had a brutal curve system that made it difficult to get great grades, I'm not sure if that's still an issue. |
That's a strange way to think about the salaries of those humanities professors. Their salaries are based on their skills as professors and the demand for their expertise and skills in the education setting. I see no relationship to any non academic career and no reason their salaries should be based on a non academic career if they are good at what they do (which is an academic career). ??? |
+100 What a bizarre way to look at salaries for humanities professors. Thank goodness sanity still prevails in terms of setting their salaries. Reducing everything to how much you could make at a commercial job kind of devalues what it means to be human. |
Yes and it would probably be good for your dd to be exposed to people that ha e a diverse range of ideologies and opinions. Going somewhere like a slac would be too much of a bubble imo. Don't you want her to be exposed to people across the political spectrum? |
You do know Jackie lied, right? |
I don't understand these comments. Don't you believe that SLACs try to attract diverse ranges of students? If anything, you will be forced to interact more with those diverse students in a small environment. You will be much more likely to see them all the time. I don't know of any SLACs that do not try to attract a broad range of students. You are stereotyping the SLACs. Also, whether you interact with different types of human beings has more to do with your efforts to do so than which college you go to. |