New poster. Are you kidding? You walk in for the tour and the first thing they hit you with is the new mission statement, with "Catholic" all over it. |
I was asking because the PP said her kid's school has a dyslexia specialist. Do public school reading specialists typically have OG and other specialized training, do you know? |
Woods Mission Statement: "An inclusive Catholic community preparing boys and girls to lead lives of significance". Seems pretty benign to me. Of course they're going to mention Catholicism in their mission statement---it's a Catholic school after all! Not at all unusual for a Catholic organization to include this in their mission statement---bet you'd find the same if you looked at the mission statements for Georgetown University, Holy Cross Hospital, SOME, etc. If you don't want to see the slightest trace of Catholicism, then Woods probably isn't a good fit. However, I can tell you from personal experience that it's an incredibly welcoming and inclusive school regardless of whether a student or their family is Catholic. |
I think that it really varies by school district and school what skills the speech/language therapist and special ed teachers have. MoCo is VERY weak, IME, in dealing with dyslexia. They typically try to wait until a kid is 2+ years behind and "qualifies" for a special reading program like Wilson or Read 180. I put "qualify" in quotes because as a PP says, by law all children should get FAPE, but our experience with our dyslexic child has been that MCPS would not recognize the reading disability and would not provide any instruction. In the beginning we thought they were choosing to be difficult, but in the end, it became clear that they didn't actually know much about dyslexia or how to educate a dyslexic child. We found our reading specialist was not knowledgeable about any reading instruction programs other than the basic Fountas-Pinnell benchmark reading system that is used county-wide. In fact, a number of the "reading specialists" over the years were just general education teachers who had been assigned the position of "reading specialist" without any special background or education in reading beyond that of a general ed teacher. I wish I could say ours was a unique experience in MCPS, but after having talked to a number of other parents, it seems very common. |
|
OP- I am the PP whose child attends a public school with a special education teacher who specializes in dyslexia. We are in FCPS. If you go to a public school be upfront immediately about your dyslexic child. Have your private testing report in hand. Be prepared for any push back. Absolutely have an advocate/attorney for any meetings, correspondence, etc. with the school administration. You will need an IEP to get the specialized instruction. A school's reading specialist is NOT a dyslexia specialist. Schools will try to have that person be your child's teacher, but they absolutely should not be his/her teacher. A reading specialist believes that with more exposure, your child will absorb the information -- not true.
In addition to many Orton-Gillingham based interventions our school also uses a reading program that is called "Read Well" and it is awesome. All the children who are using it (at least in my child's grade) are now reading at grade level, and some are above grade level. I cannot stress enough how important an advocate is to you -- it is essential. Best of luck! |
+1000. DD is dyslexic, went through the MCPS Read 180. "Successfully" completed the program, but could not read any better. The school had nothing else to offer. Found a dyslexic therapist privately and now she can actually read. |
| MCPS never offered my dyslexic child anything other than vague resource support. We did all outside tutoring. Pricey but we had complete control and my child was not pulled out of class which was a problem for other subjects. |
Who did you use? our dc has mild issues and been diagnosed with vision issues by multiple folks - and we are looking where to do therapy. |
I should have added that, by regulation, MCPS speech/language therapists are deemed unqualified to assess for reading problems or to remediate them. This is a really damaging policy. In the mainstream professional world of speech and language pathologists, they are qualified to assess the language skills of students. So, if you go to a SLP, they can assess for (using standardized, normed tests) the degree of knowledge of the sound/symbol code, ability to segment sound, ability to blend sound, ability to manipulate sound, grasp of spelling, oral reading, reading comprehension, oral expression, etc. All these things together form the basis of the skills necessary to read effectively. We had loads of standardized, normed tests that we presented to MCPS to show the weak underlying reading skills, but MCPS refused to acknowledge them because they were done by the SLP. MCPS rules that only psychologists and special education teachers can assess "academic achievement" which covers "reading". But, the psychologists and special ed teachers typically don't have a fine enough understanding of how sound and speech contribute to reading, that that effectively leaves a big hole in the ability of the county to "diagnose" reading disorders. |