Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:One of my friends tried working p.t. and took a 25% pay reduction in order to take Fridays off. She ended up working from home on her "off days" because there was always something urgent that she needed to work on. She ended working the same schedule for less hours. She's back to FT now.
This pretty much describes my current situation. I am a non-equity partner at a mid-sized firm, came back from maternity leave at 80% so I could theoretically take a day off each week. In reality, because of my practice area, I can't really take a day off many weeks, so I still have child care for part of the day on my "day off" so I can deal with anything that comes up. I am paid 80% of the base salary I'd otherwise be paid, with an agreement stipulating that if I end up billing 1800 hours my pay will be "trued up" at the end of the year. Bonus is completely discretionary and based in part on hours. What is annoying is that many partners at my firm (and other firms) bill less than the expected number of hours and are still paid at 100% salary -- so I basically took a pay cut and am working more hours than many of the partners in the firm. It is still worth it to me at this particular point in time because of the immense flexibility I have, but still...not exactly fair.
In my view, the main things you should be concerned with are (a) will they pay you fairly based on hours worked even if you exceed whatever your actual commitment is, and (b) how unhappy will you be if you end up working more than part-time (i.e., how will you deal with childcare, etc.).