| $2.7 house with 900k down. |
| We put 300 down on a 1.05 home. We could have put more down but wanted to keep the money in other investments. |
| We're in the market for a new house. Looking at the $1.2M-1.4M range and will put about $500-600K down. |
| 20% down on 1.1. Wouldn't put too much more down to maximize tax benefit and diversify funds. |
| We put down 5% down on a new 830k home with 3.23% 30 year va loan at the very bottom of the market. It is now worth 1.1 million a few years later and we owe 790k |
| We owe 1 mil on a 1.25 mil house |
Do you have to pay a PMI because you didn't put 20% down? |
Exactly. We did just over 20 percent on 1.3 M. Especially when mortgage rates were crazy low, you can put that money to better use elsewhere. |
| We rolled over $400k in equity to buy our $900k house. Nothing but good timing and a lot of luck on our part. |
| We put down 5% on 800,000 home (VA loan). We decided to rent our 1st home rather than sell it for a larger down payment. If needed, we could sell the first home, but hope it will be worth more as an investment/rental property. |
|
We have a mortgage of just under $950,00 on a $1.5 m house in NWDC.
Since one can deduct interest paid on a mortgage from your federal taxes, it's smarter to not put too much down. |
Such a fallacy. It's better not to put too much down because interest rates are lower than expected returns in the market. |
Why would being able to handle a high monthly payment be that different than being able to plunk down a very large lump sum for the down payment? I think the obvious answer is that there are some very wealthy people out there and especially in the DC area. |
Huh? I would call $200,000 "substantial savings". |
|
+1
I call this sort of nonsense "lawyer math"
|