Oh yeah forgot one the S&L crisis of the 80s. So if you are so worried about uncertainty you'd be should've been renting for the the last 25 years + infinity. |
This is my comment. I add that there is heavy pressure on a limited number of neighborhoods because of a failure of social services in many other neighborhoods--- schools, safety, tranportation. If efficient public transportion(metro, trolleys) was ubiquitous, quality schools common, and violent crime less, buyers would have an exponentially larger pool of houses to choose from. Prices would be more affordable. The population attempting to buy into the modest-sized neighborhoods of Arlington, Del Ray, Upper NW, CCDC, Bethesda, etc., far exceeds what these neighborhoods can absorb. Frustrated buyers would do well to work for better schools, transportation and safety across the region to see their prospects improve, and to share the wealth with all our neighbors. |
| It is taken for granted that many neighborhoods are just off the map, off the table, don't we? |
...mean, "isn't it?" at the end there. |
Uhhhh...no shared walls and having to put up with neighbors' booming bass. |
+1000 This is exactly it. The reason why people are paying a million for a tiny old house is because there is a perception that there is only a small number of quality neighborhoods in the region. So, yeah, if other areas were improved, then things would even out. There would be a larger pool of moderately priced houses in decent areas with decent schools. But I think that the people who have already bought into those coveted neighborhoods are very active in keeping up the perception that their neighborhoods are really the only rational choices. I think, in part to both justify and maintain, their high property values, they participate in stigmatizing other areas, areas that would likely improve if people moved into them. |
| ...Or if services improved for the people already living there, 17:22. |
Hopefully, they will. B/c, honestly, it's ridiculous to write off half the region. |
| Though the opposite appears to be the case in the NW. 25 yrs ago there was almost no middle class wotp. Since then many areas eotp have gentrified but prices wotp keep rising. |
|
Rather, almost no middle class eotp....
The gentrification of the inner NW and Cap. Hill has made the whole city a more attractive place to live thus driving up prices everywhere. I guess this general trend will continue for some time. |
Throw in walkability and metro access (in blocks--not driving to a lot) and the list gets even tinier (ESP when you want quality public schools). I think only 1 or 2 neighborhoods in the entire DC area meet this description. |
| Ignoring the needs of some screws everyone. I don't see this notion soaking into the DMV zeitgeist anytime soon. |
|
I moved to Capitol Hill in 1996. I never saw a child under the age of 14 and I never saw any white children at all. None.
Neighborhoods change. |
It isn't the buyers responsibility to ensure that the seller breaks even or turns a profit. It is a business transaction and each party is trying to get the best deal for themselves. Ultimately, the market decides the value of property at any given time. That isn't greed. |
Somebody made a comment a few posts up about how "neighborhoods would improve if people moved there." "People?" Aren't there already people in neighborhoods? It's such a given that "people" means "white people," that a post like that just comes and goes. |