Jeff - Have Right Wing Nuts Taken Over Your Blog Lately???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps PP, perhaps...but I also look to this "definition"

There is no single set of policies that are universally regarded as conservative, because the meaning of conservatism depends on what is considered traditional in a given place and time. Thus, conservatives from different parts of the world - each upholding their respective traditions - may disagree on a wide range of issues.

That's just another way of saying they find change threatening.

And yet millions of Americans looked the other way when Joe Biden, Hillary Cinton and Dear Leader all spoke of their firm belief in traditional marrage in 2007.

I think you confuse "change" with rammed down throats without comprimise.

Telling a business owner that they now have to pay for their employees birth control isn't change, it's force.

You sound like the same people who did not want to desegregate restaurants and bathrooms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah, the Jeffinator special: Conservatives can have all their posts strung together and publicly criticized by Jeff. Then mob mentality sets in. Fun times.

Conservatives fear criticism, we get it. Do you want us to take it easy on you?

In the marketplace of ideas, it sounds like you are looking for price supports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gotta love the salon libs on here.
1 % ters high on kool aid,pretending to care about the rest.

for real. so down to earth and in touch with the people.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta love the salon libs on here.
1 % ters high on kool aid,pretending to care about the rest.

for real. so down to earth and in touch with the people.

Yeah. I heard a lot about how "out of touch" I was and "living in a bubble" this past October when I was predicting an Obama victory with wins in Florida, Virginia, and Ohio.

But, I'm sure that you -- plugged into Fox News and Rasmussen -- had the real scoop. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, the Jeffinator special: Conservatives can have all their posts strung together and publicly criticized by Jeff. Then mob mentality sets in. Fun times.

Conservatives fear criticism, we get it. Do you want us to take it easy on you?

In the marketplace of ideas, it sounds like you are looking for price supports.

Is calling someone a segregationist and insinuating racism what you consider criticism?

In the realm of tolerance, you seem to be lacking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, the Jeffinator special: Conservatives can have all their posts strung together and publicly criticized by Jeff. Then mob mentality sets in. Fun times.

Conservatives fear criticism, we get it. Do you want us to take it easy on you?

In the marketplace of ideas, it sounds like you are looking for price supports.

Is calling someone a segregationist and insinuating racism what you consider criticism?

In the realm of tolerance, you seem to be lacking.

There you go again. No one called you a racist or a segregationist. You are being touchy and reading too much into comments.

[Anonymous]

Hey PP, what does the comment at the top of the page say again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey PP, what does the comment at the top of the page say again?

Sign. I did not say you were a racist. How would I even know, the subject of skin color hadn't even come up. I illustrated my point by using as example from history, one which I imagined we both agree on. It's called an analogy.

I am saying that your objection to change was similar to that of those opposing integration. And to make the point crystal clear, I'm sure we can both agree that the discomfort felt by those people was not enough of a reason to put the brakes on addressing racial segregation in America. Likewise, your feeling that society is moving too fast is not enough of a reason to stop progress in these other areas. You need a better reason than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, the Jeffinator special: Conservatives can have all their posts strung together and publicly criticized by Jeff. Then mob mentality sets in. Fun times.

Conservatives fear criticism, we get it. Do you want us to take it easy on you?
In the marketplace of ideas, it sounds like you are looking for price supports.

Not easy. Just equally. I've never seen it happen to a liberal.
And pretty sure I don't need price supports for anything but really have no idea what you're yammering about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey PP, what does the comment at the top of the page say again?

Sign. I did not say you were a racist. How would I even know, the subject of skin color hadn't even come up. I illustrated my point by using as example from history, one which I imagined we both agree on. It's called an analogy.

I am saying that your objection to change was similar to that of those opposing integration. And to make the point crystal clear, I'm sure we can both agree that the discomfort felt by those people was not enough of a reason to put the brakes on addressing racial segregation in America. Likewise, your feeling that society is moving too fast is not enough of a reason to stop progress in these other areas. You need a better reason than that.

A) I'm not the poster
B) You can put whatever spin you want on it; your statement called that poster a racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey PP, what does the comment at the top of the page say again?

Sign. I did not say you were a racist. How would I even know, the subject of skin color hadn't even come up. I illustrated my point by using as example from history, one which I imagined we both agree on. It's called an analogy.

I am saying that your objection to change was similar to that of those opposing integration. And to make the point crystal clear, I'm sure we can both agree that the discomfort felt by those people was not enough of a reason to put the brakes on addressing racial segregation in America. Likewise, your feeling that society is moving too fast is not enough of a reason to stop progress in these other areas. You need a better reason than that.

A) I'm not the poster
B) You can put whatever spin you want on it; your statement called that poster a racist.

I'm sorry that the educational system failed you. But no, I did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps PP, perhaps...but I also look to this "definition"

There is no single set of policies that are universally regarded as conservative, because the meaning of conservatism depends on what is considered traditional in a given place and time. Thus, conservatives from different parts of the world - each upholding their respective traditions - may disagree on a wide range of issues.

That's just another way of saying they find change threatening.

And yet millions of Americans looked the other way when Joe Biden, Hillary Cinton and Dear Leader all spoke of their firm belief in traditional marrage in 2007.

I think you confuse "change" with rammed down throats without comprimise.

Telling a business owner that they now have to pay for their employees birth control isn't change, it's force.

?? did you also feel the same about your insurance dollars going to pay for your male employees viagra ? Birth control should save money in long run.

[Anonymous]

I believe I answered this a few back. Viagra treats a medical condition - sexual dysfunction. If my female colleague has a medical condition that requires the pill and her insurance company pays for it? That's fine with me.

If you can tell me what I've done to become indebted to someone else to the degree that I have to pay for their sexual behavior, I'd be interested in knowing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey PP, what does the comment at the top of the page say again?

Sign. I did not say you were a racist. How would I even know, the subject of skin color hadn't even come up. I illustrated my point by using as example from history, one which I imagined we both agree on. It's called an analogy.

I am saying that your objection to change was similar to that of those opposing integration. And to make the point crystal clear, I'm sure we can both agree that the discomfort felt by those people was not enough of a reason to put the brakes on addressing racial segregation in America. Likewise, your feeling that society is moving too fast is not enough of a reason to stop progress in these other areas. You need a better reason than that.

A) I'm not the poster
B) You can put whatever spin you want on it; your statement called that poster a racist.

I'm sorry that the educational system failed you. But no, I did not.

Pretty words don't change the implication of your statement.

[Anonymous]

It's interesting to note that the adults on this thread clearly are conservatives/Republicans.

While the other side chases its tail in circles and name-calling.

Forward.....