Pam is great with students who are strong candidates at any school (in other words, the ones where you don't really need a consultant), but she can't be bothered with kids who are less than perfect on paper. We have one of each, and she completely sold our younger child short. If we had trusted Pam's judgment, we wouldn't even have applied for the younger child. Guess what, though? She ended up at a "Big 3" -- and without any sibling pull. Bottom line: a huge waste of money for both kids. |
22:25 here again, we also chose a K-8 for the same reasons. Also because we felt their focus on elementary and middle school needs would not get pushed aside by needs of High school population |
| 07:18 - I disagree with Pam - she looked at the whole picture for both DCs and they weren't perfect on paper. Ultimately one DC stayed in public because that was a better fit for that DC, but it was worth the exercise of applying to Big 3s and other private schools, to see where they were better (and where they were behind) the Fairfax AAP program. |
|
OP,
I vote for using an EC, too, so long as money is not a concern. You will get peace of mind, the consultant will explain the lay of the land. But also go with your instincts, if the education consultant says oh no, DC will never get in there, apply anyway if you feel it's a good fit. I would not invest in the whole package. I think it seems desperate. (Education consultants are great in some instances, like moving to a new area, transferring out to find a better fit, etc.) |
| What is the hourly rate for consultant? |