Check out the leader of the free world

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
There are many who still have visceral reaction to a Black man who refuses to do their bidding. It is very evident on this website. There is a breathtaking arrogance to the Obama hating posts here--the vey idea that "anything is better than Obama" and How dare he (Obama) not be a radicalized progressive like me and not turn America into SWEDEN? Really? And so they will write in their candidate with their weak little hands. And when Obama is replaced by Romney or Perry for 8 years, they will wash their weak little hands of it like Pontius Pilate. How do you live with yourselves?

Apparently, the only non-arrogant response is to shut up, line up, and vote for Obama. Nice straw man about Sweden by the way. Could you please link to a quote by one single American progressive who is angry at Obama for not turning America into Sweden? I'll wait.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he was trying to show off his diamond bangle bracelets but they slipped up the sleeve of his coat jacket.

It's funny how nobody's ever a racist, yet all the old racist memes suddenly come back in full force. "Hey, look! Black folk in the White House don't know how to act! They're all uppity and don't care about anything but bling! Not a racist though!"

You're an idiot. I posted a link on Michelle wearing thousands of dollars worth of diamond bracelets and how I thought it was in poor taste. I was mocking myself. I am not a racist and I was in no way making a statement about a black man and bling you moron. I was MOCKING MYSELF.

Interesting that your thoughts go straight to racism. Hmmm, maybe YOU are a racist. Are you????

If you really want posters to know about messages that you posted in other threads, you probably need to get a username and post very memorable posts. Short of that, you may want to consider taking a valium.

Well, one thing I am not is a racist. I don't need a valium because I mocked myself and I wasn't trying to alert posters to the other thread, I was a little shocked someone got "racist" from what I wrote. But, okay. Valium it is.

[Anonymous]

Is it not true that if Obama loses in 2012 he is free to run again for another, albeit limited, term anytime after his successor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it not true that if Obama loses in 2012 he is free to run again for another, albeit limited, term anytime after his successor?

Amendment 22:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. "

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it not true that if Obama loses in 2012 he is free to run again for another, albeit limited, term anytime after his successor?

Amendment 22:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. "

I am reading that as a yes he can run again but would likely be damaged goods if it went down that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it not true that if Obama loses in 2012 he is free to run again for another, albeit limited, term anytime after his successor?

Amendment 22:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. "

I am reading that as a yes he can run again but would likely be damaged goods if it went down that way.

Jimmy Carter can run again and so can George H.W. Bush. Obama is already damaged goods. For the good of his party, and the nation, he should pull a L.B. Johnson or a full Sherman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it not true that if Obama loses in 2012 he is free to run again for another, albeit limited, term anytime after his successor?

Amendment 22:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. "

I am reading that as a yes he can run again but would likely be damaged goods if it went down that way.

Jimmy Carter can run again and so can George H.W. Bush. Obama is already damaged goods. For the good of his party, and the nation, he should pull a L.B. Johnson or a full Sherman.

You mean run through red states like a knife through butter?