+1. Yes, I like how OP says nothing about her rental costs. Buying usually leads to great appreciation, which is why I’ve owned six homes and keep moving up. Plus tax breaks. It’s called diversifying your investments and everyone who can do so should buy and hold. |
You are effectively wasting your money. Very few people actually run the numbers . Home appreciation is nowhere near S&P . A mansion in DC was $600k in 1990s. Now it’s $4m house (if you are lucky with best zip codes). If you invested in stocks you would have $5.6m now and no worries about house maintenance. It also very much depends on RE class. Condos actually depreciate not appreciate |
If you want to be a billionaire, good luck. But you can become a multi millionaire (what used to be the millionaire next door) by living below your means, not buying expensive cars and investing your savings (and you will save a lot by not buying a lot of unneccessary junk). It's definitely not nonsense. I don't know any billionaires either, but I do know plenty of multimillionaires who are doing well enough. |
What do you mean? Gives you away, how? |
|
Wrong. Any investment advisor will tell you to diversity in stocks bonds, precious metals and real estate when one goes up, another may go down. I’ve made millions on real estate. It’s done better than my portfolio. |
I would love to see which real estate earned you millions. Single family homes and condos are money dump |
my PITI and HOA fees are a total of 1900/mo and I am charging someone 4,000/mo, and my property has increased by 40% in the last 4.5yrs i gotta say I love how you think! |
Which city/state? Surely not DC |
Sure you do.
Troll harder |
Im in major metropolitan area (not DC) and rents in both buildings where I lived were increased by 3% year over year. In DC I am a landlord and rents are stagnating/lower than during Covid at my multi units. I would love to learn in which state you can beat S&P in rental income. And no I would NOT buy out of pure expectation of appreciation |
It doesn't work like that. If you bought the $600k house in the 90's, you down paid $120k + mortgage payments. So if comparing the returns to stocks, it should be based on returns on. $120k + paying rent. |
| I can't think of anything else other than real estate that is safe and can buy with 9x leverage. |
The point is I did compare, ran multiple spreadsheets . Stocks returned better |
Ask those investors who bought before 2008 crisis with zero down and foreclosed. |