Master List: Epstein Confidantes and Consequences

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Flavio Briatore, from F1 racing world, no consequences I know about

Naomi Campbell, in photos with child victims more than once

Naomi is a provider and procured and accepted blood diamonds and war loot. Her dead friend Annabelle Neilson (“Ladies of London,” aristocratic background, addiction problems) is in the emails stating directly that she arranged for girls to come to Epstein parties.

[Anonymous]

Casey Wasserman. Founder of the Wasserman group sports and talent agency. Head of the LA Olympic organizing committee.

Said to be selling his agency but LA is keeping him for the Olympic Committee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Casey Wasserman. Founder of the Wasserman group sports and talent agency. Head of the LA Olympic organizing committee.

Said to be selling his agency but LA is keeping him for the Olympic Committee.

If only American athletes would refuse to participate until he’s out.

[Anonymous]

New Mexico approves comprehensive probe of Epstein’s Zorro Ranch http://reut.rs/40bJph9

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So it looks like *checks notes* Hyatt hotels and Dubai show more accountability than the American government. Great! Great great!

[Anonymous]

One of the owners of the New York Giants

[Anonymous]

Peter Mandelson - kept up friendship with Epstein long after first conviction. He and his husband took money from Epstein. Probably passed sensitive info to Epstein. Finally resigned from parliament in 2026. Being investigated by British police.

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem - most definitely participated in abuse. Sender of “torture video”.
Resigned as CEO of DP World a few days ago

[Anonymous]

“ Kathy Rammluer: close friend of Epstein, got all kinds of free goodies from him despite being a multimillionaire herself.
Status: fired from her job at Goldman Sachs, still rich AF.”

Corrections:

1) she was not official fired from her job but “resigned”
2) no statement from GS that she exercised terrible judgement and that employing her was an error in judgement
3) No statement from Obama that she had terrible judgment and he was miss taken in hiring her.

Similar for Larry Summers. Harvard has not fired him. Past Presidents that have appointed him have not denounced him.

Similar for Chelsea Clinton to state she regrets inviting Maxwell to her wedding.
And so on and so on.

There was a horrible and vast web connected with Epstein. Very little accountability so far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except, nobody cares. Old news.

Wasn’t it once the role of the most noble among us to look upon those who had been cast aside by society and welcome them into fellowship and reformation?

Obviously Epstein had issues and the government failed in their duty, but to cancel everyone who ever associated with the man is insanity. I don’t cancel the people in my family who are affiliated with people convicted any crime. If I came across a childhood friend convicted of murder (I have a few to be honest), I’d like to think I wouldn’t just cast them aside or refuse to speak with them. I certainly wouldn’t deem anyone who soaks with them later in life as worthy of cancellation.

This nonsense has gone too far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except, nobody cares. Old news.

Wasn’t it once the role of the most noble among us to look upon those who had been cast aside by society and welcome them into fellowship and reformation?

Obviously Epstein had issues and the government failed in their duty, but to cancel everyone who ever associated with the man is insanity. I don’t cancel the people in my family who are affiliated with people convicted any crime. If I came across a childhood friend convicted of murder (I have a few to be honest), I’d like to think I wouldn’t just cast them aside or refuse to speak with them. I certainly wouldn’t deem anyone who soaks with them later in life as worthy of cancellation.

This nonsense has gone too far.

Seriously. Honestly if one of my friends had a friend who had a sex island and had teen girls giving him “massages” all the time and advised Bill Gates on his STD and got prosecuted for soliciting a minor and maybe murdered a bunch of little girls it’s just NOT RIGHT to reject that person. I mean, all they did was look the other way! They didn’t do any of the raping!! What if they went to the sex island and didn’t even KNOW it was a sex island hmm?? Why are we persecuting them so much!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except, nobody cares. Old news.

Wasn’t it once the role of the most noble among us to look upon those who had been cast aside by society and welcome them into fellowship and reformation?

Obviously Epstein had issues and the government failed in their duty, but to cancel everyone who ever associated with the man is insanity. I don’t cancel the people in my family who are affiliated with people convicted any crime. If I came across a childhood friend convicted of murder (I have a few to be honest), I’d like to think I wouldn’t just cast them aside or refuse to speak with them. I certainly wouldn’t deem anyone who soaks with them later in life as worthy of cancellation.

This nonsense has gone too far.

It’s not about “cancelling” everyone but people taking responsibility for lapses of judgement and morality. Ignoring is endorsing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Steve Bannon: In touch with him till his arrest, actually involved in trying to help Epstein turn around his pedophile image(!!), emails with Epstein about taking down Pope Francis.

NYT article on their relationship today:

"Midafternoon in late June 2019, Stephen K. Bannon sent Jeffrey Epstein an excited series of texts. “Dude!!!!!” he wrote. “Is this real Tell me this is real.”
Mr. Epstein had just texted him a headline from The Miami Herald. It reported that victims of Mr. Epstein’s sexual abuse had lost a court battle to nullify a decade-old agreement that protected him from prosecution for those crimes.

Off and on for months, Mr. Bannon, a leader in the MAGA movement and a former top aide to President Trump, had been advising Mr. Epstein on how to handle resurrected allegations that he was a serial pedophile. Mr. Bannon recommended which lawyers to hire — his own — when to lie low and when he should jump on an opening to push his narrative. He scheduled what the two men called “media training.”

“First we need to push back on the lies; then crush the pedo/trafficking narrative; then rebuild your image as philanthropist,” Mr. Bannon wrote to Mr. Epstein in April 2019. That was five months after a Miami Herald series exposed how prosecutors had ignored evidence of Mr. Epstein’s crimes."

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/16/us/politics/jeffrey-epstein-steve-bannon.html

I’m no fan of Steve Bannon, but this one really surprised me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except, nobody cares. Old news.

Wasn’t it once the role of the most noble among us to look upon those who had been cast aside by society and welcome them into fellowship and reformation?

Obviously Epstein had issues and the government failed in their duty, but to cancel everyone who ever associated with the man is insanity. I don’t cancel the people in my family who are affiliated with people convicted any crime. If I came across a childhood friend convicted of murder (I have a few to be honest), I’d like to think I wouldn’t just cast them aside or refuse to speak with them. I certainly wouldn’t deem anyone who soaks with them later in life as worthy of cancellation.

This nonsense has gone too far.

It’s not about “cancelling” everyone but people taking responsibility for lapses of judgement and morality. Ignoring is endorsing.

New poster. I am all for going after the co-consirators to the full extent of the law. Anyone who was participated by procuring victims or abusing them, whatever party, should rot in jail. Anyone who knew about it and looked the other way should face legal consequences.

But putting someone who invited the guy to a wedding or even academics who kept up friendships with seedy people because the stupid system requires them to raise their own money is wrong. Utterly wrong. For one thing, if they didn't know what was happening, they in no way broke the law. And morally, these groups have nothing to do with one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except, nobody cares. Old news.

Everyone cares